...
首页> 外文期刊>Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals >Beating heart as an alternative for closure of secundum atrial septal defect.
【24h】

Beating heart as an alternative for closure of secundum atrial septal defect.

机译:跳动心脏作为封闭继发性房间隔缺损的替代方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We repaired secundum atrial septal defect in 135 consecutive patients from February 2003 to December 2010. There were 98 females and 37 males, with a mean age of 22.92 ± 17.46 years (range, 3-55 years). To prevent myocardial dysfunction and systemic embolism caused by the conventional technique, the operation was performed with a beating heart under cardiopulmonary bypass in 63 cases, and compared the data retrospectively with cases treated under aortic crossclamping, to determine the safety of the beating-heart technique and to evaluate risk factors for embolism in stroke patients. Patient age and size of defect were similar in both groups. There was no death and no residual shunt in either group. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 36.84 ± 9.8 min in the beating-heart group and 43.13 ± 16.7 min in the crossclamp group. The ejection fraction and the incidence of postoperative arrhythmia were similar in both groups. There were no differences in blood products transfused, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, or perioperative morbidity. In our experience, the results of the beating-heart technique were not different from the conventional technique.
机译:从2003年2月至2010年12月,我们修复了135例连续的房间隔缺损。女性98例,男性37例,平均年龄为22.92±17.46岁(范围3-55岁)。为防止传统技术引起的心肌功能障碍和全身性栓塞,在心脏搭桥手术中对跳动的心脏进行了63例手术,并将其与主动脉夹钳治疗的病例进行回顾性比较,以确定跳动心脏技术的安全性并评估中风患者栓塞的危险因素。两组的患者年龄和缺损大小相似。两组均无死亡,也无残余分流。跳动心脏组的平均体外循环时间为36.84±9.8分钟,而交叉钳组的平均为43.13±16.7分钟。两组的射血分数和术后心律失常的发生率相似。输血产品,重症监护病房住院时间,住院时间或围手术期发病率无差异。根据我们的经验,心脏跳动技术的结果与常规技术没有什么不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号