...
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Haematology >A prospective, randomized study of empirical antifungal therapy for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in children
【24h】

A prospective, randomized study of empirical antifungal therapy for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in children

机译:经验性抗真菌药物治疗儿童化学性发热性中性粒细胞减少症的前瞻性随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Given that the rationale for empirical antifungal therapy in neutropenic children is limited and based on adult patient data, we performed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial that evaluated 110 neutropenic children with persistent fever. Those at high risk for invasive fungal infections (IFI) received caspofungin (Arm C) or liposomal amphotericinB (Arm B); those with a lower risk were randomized to receive Arm B, C, or no antifungal treatment (Arm A). Complete response to empirical antifungal therapy was achieved in 90/104 patients (86·5%): 48/56 at high risk (85·7%) [88·0% in Arm B; 83·9% in Arm C (P = 0·72)], and 42/48 at low risk (87·5%) [87·5% in control Arm A, 80·0% Arm B, 94·1% Arm C; (P = 0·41)]. None of the variables tested by multiple logistic regression analysis showed a significant effect on the probability to achieve complete response. IFI was diagnosed in nine patients (8·2%, 95% confidence interval, 3·8-15·0). This randomized controlled study showed that empirical antifungal therapy was of no advantage in terms of survival without fever and IFI in patients aged <18 years and defined with low risk of IFI. Higher risk patients, including those with relapsed cancer, appear to be the target for empirical antifungal therapy during protracted febrile neutropenia.
机译:鉴于在中性粒细胞减少的儿童中进行经验性抗真菌治疗的理由是有限的,并且基于成人患者的数据,我们进行了一项前瞻性,随机对照试验,评估了110名持续发热的中性粒细胞减少的儿童。高危侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)者接受卡泊芬净(Arm C)或脂质体两性霉素B(Arm B)治疗;那些风险较低的患者被随机分配接受B,C组或不接受抗真菌治疗(Arm A)。对经验性抗真菌治疗的完全反应在90/104例患者中(86·5%):48/56处于高风险(85·7%)[A组中88%; 0%; B组; C组为83·9%(P = 0·72),低风险为42/48(87·5%)[对照组A组为87·5%,B组为80·0%,B组为94·1% C臂; (P = 0·41)]。通过多重逻辑回归分析测试的变量均未显示出对实现完全响应的概率有显着影响。 9例患者被诊断为IFI(8·2%,95%置信区间3·8-15·0)。这项随机对照研究表明,对于18岁以下且定义为IFI风险低的患者,经验性抗真菌治疗对没有发烧和IFI的生存率没有优势。高发性中性粒细胞减少症患者的高风险患者,包括那些复发性癌症患者,似乎是经验性抗真菌治疗的目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号