首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and organizational psychology >Where I-O Psychology Should Really (Re)start Its Investigation of Intelligence Constructs and Their Measurement
【24h】

Where I-O Psychology Should Really (Re)start Its Investigation of Intelligence Constructs and Their Measurement

机译:I-O心理学应该真正(重新)开始对智力结构及其测量进行调查的地方

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We believe that Scherbaum, Goldstein, Yusko, Ryan, and Hanges (2012) come up short in (a) their portrayal of the current understanding of the nature of intelligence as it exists in the science of mental abilities and (b) their treatment of the measurement of intelligence constructs. We argue that their view on the nature of intelligence is outdated and that measuring constructs within the domain of intelligence should not be equated only with the use of traditional cognitive ability tests as alternative work-based measures of intelligence constructs have emerged and are in dire need of empirical scrutiny.
机译:我们认为,Scherbaum,Goldstein,Yusko,Ryan和Hanges(2012)在(a)刻画当前对智力本质的理解方面存在不足,因为它们在心理能力科学中已经存在,以及(b)对智力的处理智力结构的测量。我们认为,他们对智力本质的看法已经过时,并且不应将智力领域内的测度构建等同于使用传统的认知能力测试,因为基于智力的替代工作已经出现并且迫切需要经验审查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号