...
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and organizational psychology >Scientific Principles Versus Practical Realities: Insights From Organizational Theory to Individual Psychological Assessment
【24h】

Scientific Principles Versus Practical Realities: Insights From Organizational Theory to Individual Psychological Assessment

机译:科学原理与实践现实:从组织理论到个人心理评估的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Individual psychological assessment (IPA) for executive and top management positions isn't an easy job. Still, knowledge gained over decades of scientific study suggests that we rely on structured job and organizational analyses; the construction of appropriate high- and low-fidelity simulations, cognitive tests, and affective inventories suitable in content and difficulty (Ones & Dilchert, 2009; Rubenzer, Faschingbauer, & Ones, 2000); as well as a structured and mechanical combination of the resulting information (AEgisdottir et al., 2006; Grove, Zald, Lebow, Snitz, & Nelson, 2000). And we will likely still remain painfully aware of the poor ability of even our most refined assessments for predicting executives' performance.
机译:对高管和高层管理人员进行个人心理评估(IPA)并非易事。尽管如此,数十年来科学研究所获得的知识表明,我们依赖于结构化的工作和组织分析。构建适合于内容和难度的适当的高保真度和低保真度模拟,认知测验以及情感清单(Ones&Dilchert,2009; Rubenzer,Faschingbauer,&Ones,2000);以及结果信息的结构化和机械化结合(AEgisdottir等,2006; Grove,Zald,Lebow,Snitz和Nelson,2000)。而且,即使我们进行最精细的评估来预测高管的绩效,我们仍可能会痛苦地意识到这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号