Stentless Versus Stented Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves A Consensus Statement of the International Society of Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) 2008

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this consensus conference was to determine whether stentless bioprosthetic valves improve clinical and resource outcomes compared with stented valves in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement, and to outline evidence-based recommendations for the use of stentless and stented bioprosthetic valves in adult aortic valve replacement.Methods: Before the consensus conference, the best available evidence was reviewed in that systematic reviews, randomized trials, and nonrandomized trials were considered in descending order of validity and importance. At the consensus conference, evidence-based statements were created, and consensus processes were used to determine the ensuing recommendations. The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology system was used to label the level of evidence and class of recommendation. Results and Recommendations: Seventeen randomized studies published in 23 articles involving 1317 patients, and 14 nonrandomized trial published in 18 articles involving 2485 patients were included in the meta-analysis and consensus conference. All randomized trials inserted the stentless bioprosthetic valves in the subcoronary configuration. The consensus panel agreed upon the following statements and recommendations in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement:1.Stentless and stented valves both provide an excellent valve substitute for aortic valve disease (class I, level A).2. In certain situations, the early superior hemodynamic performance of stentless bioprosthesis offers advantages over stented valves (class Ila, level A).Because there were no randomized,control trial comparing subcoronary stentless prosthetic valve and root replacement, the following recommendations are derived from expert opinion:1. In the absence of aortic root disease and with an annulus greater than or equal to 21 mm, either stentless or stented valves are acceptable alternatives for the majority of patients when a current (second or