首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and organizational psychology >Identifying the Ethical (Unethical) Undercurrent of Identified Surveys
【24h】

Identifying the Ethical (Unethical) Undercurrent of Identified Surveys

机译:确定已确定调查的道德(不道德)暗流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although it is important to bring up the discussion of identified surveys, it seems that Saari and Scherbaum (2011) have not addressed two pertinent underlying ques-tions: "Are identified surveys intrinsically moral or ethical?" and "Should industrial–organizational (1-0) psychologists be involved in their use?" I argue that we cannot avoid the core issues of morality involved in the broader sense. Furthermore, I argue that contemplation of the underlying moral issues concerning identified surveys should be more salient to our decisions of whether or not to use identified surveys than the psychometric reasoning against them (e.g., possible decrease in validity due to lowered response rate and/or to response bias) or their potential benefits. Although Saari and Scherbaum briefly mentioned three ethical concerns, I go a bit further and get at the core of the issue.
机译:尽管提起对已确定的调查的讨论很重要,但Saari和Scherbaum(2011)似乎并未解决两个相关的基本问题:“已确定的调查本质上是道德的还是道德的?”和“工业组织(1-0)的心理学家应该参与其中吗?”我认为,我们无法避免从广义上讲涉及道德的核心问题。此外,我认为,对于已确定的调查所涉及的基本道德问题的思考应该比我们针对已确定的调查进行心理测量的推理更有意义,这取决于我们对是否使用已确定的调查的决定(例如,由于降低的回应率和/或应对偏见)或其潜在收益。尽管Saari和Scherbaum简要提到了三个道德问题,但我走得更远,并成为问题的核心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号