首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and organizational psychology >Why Performance Management Will Remain Broken:Authoritarian Communication
【24h】

Why Performance Management Will Remain Broken:Authoritarian Communication

机译:绩效管理为何会失败:威权沟通

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We agree with Pulakos and O'Leary (2011)that the focus of efforts in performance appraisal should be on the relationship between managers and their employees.We also agree with their focus on relational processes rather than structures (e.g., meritgrids) or outcomes (e.g., goals) as ways to intervene in and evaluate effectiveness of performance management systems. However,separating appraisal systems from this focal relationship is perhaps more of an analytic lever, based on reductionist attempts to analyze and understand the complex phenomena around performance feedback,than it is a solid basis for practical action.
机译:我们同意Pulakos和O'Leary(2011)的观点,即绩效评估的工作重点应该放在经理与员工之间的关系上。我们也同意他们对关系过程的关注,而不是结构(例如绩效)或结果例如目标)作为干预和评估绩效管理系统有效性的方法。然而,基于还原论者试图分析和理解围绕绩效反馈的复杂现象,将评估系统从这种焦点关系中分离出来可能更像是一种分析手段,而不是为实际行动奠定坚实的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号