首页> 外文期刊>Industrial Crops and Products >Biobased polymers and cationic micro-fibrillated cellulose as retention and drainage aids in papermaking: Comparison between softwood and bagasse pulps
【24h】

Biobased polymers and cationic micro-fibrillated cellulose as retention and drainage aids in papermaking: Comparison between softwood and bagasse pulps

机译:生物基聚合物和阳离子微纤化纤维素在造纸中的助留和排水助剂:针叶木浆和蔗渣浆的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Water soluble cationic chitosan (C-Ch) and surface-modified microfibrillated cellulose (C-MFC) were prepared and characterized. C-MFC was prepared by reaction of MFC (microfibrillated cellulose) with beta-chloroethyldiethylamine followed by quatemization using methyl iodide while C-Ch was prepared by reaction of a commercial chitosan (Ch) with 2,3-epoxypropyltrimethyl ammonium chloride. C-Ch and C-MFC were characterized by elemental analysis (nitrogen content), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and surface charge determination. The prepared C-Ch and C-MFC were used with bentonite in order to improve drainage and filler retention in paper handsheets made from softwood and bagasse pulps. Dosage rates were 0.05-0.2% (w/w, weight of additive by weight of fibres) and 0.05-1% (w/w) for C-Ch and C-MFC, respectively. When used alone, these polymers did not induce any noticeable effect on drainage but they improved the retention of ground calcium carbonate (GCC). The effect of C-MFC/bentonite and C-Ch/bentonite systems on filler retention was more pronounced in case of bagasse pulp than for softwood pulp. The use of C-Ch improved filler retention more than C-MFC did. Comparisons with a commercially available cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM) showed that CPAM was the most efficient additive regarding both drainage and GCC retention, followed by Ch, C-Ch, and finally C-MFC. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:制备并表征了水溶性阳离子壳聚糖(C-Ch)和表面改性的微纤化纤维素(C-MFC)。 C-MFC的制备是通过MFC(微纤化纤维素)与β-氯乙基二乙胺反应,然后使用碘甲烷进行季铵化,而C-Ch则是通过将商用壳聚糖(Ch)与2,3-环氧丙基三甲基氯化铵反应来制备。 C-Ch和C-MFC通过元素分析(氮含量),傅立叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)和表面电荷测定来表征。制备的C-Ch和C-MFC与膨润土一起使用,以改善由软木和蔗渣纸浆制成的手抄纸中的排水性和填料保留率。 C-Ch和C-MFC的剂量率分别为0.05-0.2%(w / w,添加剂的重量,以纤维重量计)和0.05-1%(w / w)。单独使用时,这些聚合物不会对排水产生任何明显的影响,但它们可以改善碳酸钙(GCC)的保留率。与蔗渣纸浆相比,在蔗渣纸浆中,C-MFC /膨润土和C-Ch /膨润土体系对填料保留的影响更为明显。与C-MFC相比,使用C-Ch可以改善填料保留率。与市售的阳离子聚丙烯酰胺(CPAM)的比较表明,就排水和GCC保留而言,CPAM是最有效的添加剂,其次是Ch,C-Ch,最后是C-MFC。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号