首页> 外文期刊>Indian Phytopathology >Chemical management of Phytophthora blight of colocasia in mid hills of Himachal Pradesh.
【24h】

Chemical management of Phytophthora blight of colocasia in mid hills of Himachal Pradesh.

机译:喜马al尔邦中部丘陵芋的疫病疫霉的化学处理。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A study was conducted to evaluate the commonly used and new fungicides for their efficacy against Phytophthora blight (P. colocasiae) of C. esculenta and to develop an effective and economic disease management spray schedule. Five fungicides, i.e. ridomil MZ (metalaxyl 8+mancozeb 64 WP), Blitox (copper oxychloride 50 WP), Dithane N-45 (mancozeb 75 WP), Kavach (chlorothalonil 75 WP) and Antracol (propineb 70 WP), were evaluated during 2007-08. Three sprays of the fungicides were given at an interval of 10 days for protectant and 15 days for systemic with the first spray given at the appearance of the disease. All the fungicides significantly reduced the disease compared to the control. Individually Ridomil MZ (metalaxyl+mancozeb) at 0.25% was the best treatment, resulting in only 7.36 (15.67) percentage disease index (PDI) and provided 84.27% disease control (PDC). Its efficacy in controlling the disease during both years was also significantly higher than all the other fungicides. Amongst the different spray schedules, schedule IX (Ridomil MZ-Ridomil MZ-Ridomil MZ) was found highly effective as indicated by low PDI (6.40) and high PDC (86.63) values followed by schedule I (Ridomil-Blitox-Blitox) and schedule II (Ridomil-dithane-dithane) with PDI 12.90 and 14.00, PDC 71.83 and 69.43, respectively. The PDI and PDC under schedule I and II were statistically at par with each other indicating thereby the importance of application of combination of systemic and protectant fungicide at the initiation of the disease. High corm yields under schedule IX (201.40 q/ha), I (160.04 q/ha) and II (148.16 q/ha) showed their better efficiency, which was further supported by their high cost:benefit ratio (1:6.05, 1:6.80 and 1:7.45, respectively). The cost:benefit ratio was higher in schedule II and I compared to schedule IX, but the yield and PDI were significantly lower than schedule IX. The schedule X (farmers' practice) have shown low yield (114.86 q/ha) and cost:benefit ratio of 1:5.71. Therefore, it can be concluded that foliar spray of Ridomil MZ at 0.25% at 15 days interval is the most effective in managing phytophthora blight of colocasia under field conditions followed by Blitox at 0.20% in Dithane M-45 at 0.25% out of 10 spray schedules tested for their comparative efficacy the schedules 9 (Ridomil-Ridomil-Ridomil) followed by schedule I (Ridomil-Blitox-Blitox) and II (Ridomil-Dithane M-45-Dithane M-45) were found the most effective in the management of Phytophthora blight.
机译:进行了一项研究,以评估常用杀真菌剂和新杀真菌剂对蓝藻疫霉(P. colocasiae)的功效,并制定有效和经济的疾病管理喷剂时间表。在此过程中,评估了五种杀菌剂,即ridomil MZ(甲霜灵8 + mancozeb 64 WP),Blitox(氯氧化铜50 WP),Dithane N-45(mancozeb 7​​5 WP),Kavach(百菌清75 WP)和Antracol(propineb 70 WP)。 2007-08。每隔10天喷洒三剂杀菌剂作保护剂,对全身性喷洒15天,在疾病出现时第一次喷洒。与对照相比,所有的杀菌剂均能显着减少疾病。单独使用0.25%的Ridomil MZ(甲霜灵+曼考布)是最好的治疗方法,仅导致7.36(15.67)%的疾病指数(PDI),并提供了84.27%的疾病控制(PDC)。在这两年中,其控制疾病的功效也显着高于所有其他杀菌剂。在不同的喷雾时间表中,发现时间表IX(Ridomil MZ-Ridomil MZ-Ridomil MZ)非常有效,如低PDI(6.40)和高PDC(86.63)值所示,然后是时间表I(Ridomil-Blitox-Blitox)和时间表II(Ridomil-dithane-dithane),其PDI分别为12.90和14.00,PDC为71.83和69.43。附表I和II中的PDI和PDC在统计学上彼此相等,表明由此在疾病开始时应用全身性和保护性杀真菌剂的组合的重要性。附表IX(201.40 q / ha),I(160.04 q / ha)和II(148.16 q / ha)的高球茎产量显示出更好的效率,其高成本效益比(1:6.05,1 :分别为:6.80和1:7.45)。与附表IX相比,附表II和I中的成本:收益比率更高,但是收益和PDI明显低于附表IX。计划X(农民的实践)显示出低产(114.86 q / ha),成本与收益之比为1:5.71。因此,可以得出结论:在田间条件下,以0.25%的间隔喷洒Ridomil MZ的叶面喷剂对田间疫病的防治最为有效,其次是在10次喷施中,以0.25%的Blitox喷施于0.25%的Dithane M-45中的Blitox。附表9(Ridomil-Ridomil-Ridomil)和附表I(Ridomil-Blitox-Blitox)和II(Ridomil-Dithane M-45-Dithane M-45)在管理中最有效疫霉菌病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号