...
首页> 外文期刊>Biology of blood and marrow transplantation: journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation >Comparison of Cyclophosphamide Combined with Total Body Irradiation, Oral Busulfan, or Intravenous Busulfan for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
【24h】

Comparison of Cyclophosphamide Combined with Total Body Irradiation, Oral Busulfan, or Intravenous Busulfan for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

机译:成人急性淋巴细胞性白血病同种异体造血细胞移植与环磷酰胺联合全身照射,口服白消安或静脉注射白消安的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We conducted a retrospective analysis to compare outcomes in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) with conditioning regimens containing cyclophosphamide (CY) in combination with total body irradiation (TBI), oral busulfan (p.o. BU), or intravenous busulfan (i.v. BU). We used data for January 2000 to December 2012 from the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program of the Japan Society of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. We identified 2130 patients treated with TBI/CY (n = 2028), p.o. BU/CY (n = 60), or i.v. BU/CY (n = 42). Two-year overall survival (OS) and 2-year relapse-free survival rates were 69.0% and 62.1%, respectively, in the TBI/CY group, 55.9% and 54.2% in the p.o. BU/CY group, and 71.0% and 46.8% in the i.v. BU/CY group. In multivariate analysis, compared with TBI/CY, p.o. BU/CY, but not i.v. BU/CY, was associated with lower OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.46; P=.047) and a higher incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HR, 3.36; P =.030). No between-group differences were seen in the incidence of nonrelapse mortality, relapse, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), or chronic GVHD. We suggest that i.v. BU/CY might be a possible alternative allo-HCT conditioning regimen for adults with ALL who are not suitable for TBI. (C) 2016 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.
机译:我们进行了一项回顾性分析,以比较接受异体造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)和环磷酰胺(CY)联合全身照射(TBI),口服白消安( po BU)或静脉注射白消安(iv BU)。我们使用的是2000年1月至2012年12月日本造血细胞移植学会的Transplant Registry统一管理计划的数据。我们确定了2130名接受TBI / CY治疗的患者(n = 2028),p.o。 BU / CY(n = 60),或i.v. BU / CY(n = 42)。 TBI / CY组的2年总生存率(OS)和2年的无复发生存率分别为65.9%和62.1%,而pPO则为55.9%和54.2%。 BU / CY组以及i.v.中的71.0%和46.8% BU / CY组。在多变量分析中,与TBI / CY相比,p.o。 BU / CY,但不是i.v. BU / CY与低OS(危险比[HR],1.46; P = .047)和正弦窦梗阻综合征的发生率较高(HR,3.36; P = .030)相关。在非复发死亡率,复发,急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)或慢性GVHD的发生率中,未发现组间差异。我们建议i.v.对于不适合TBI的ALL成人,BU / CY可能是一种替代的all-HCT调理方案。 (C)2016美国血液和骨髓移植学会。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号