首页> 外文期刊>ILAR Journal >Moral Problems and Perspectives for Ecological Field Research Introduction
【24h】

Moral Problems and Perspectives for Ecological Field Research Introduction

机译:生态学领域研究的道德问题与展望

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Ecological research often requires inclusion of animals in studies designed to explore ecosystem function, autecology, or options for the management and longterm survival of wildlife species or populations under growing human pressures. Although modeling approaches are sometimes helpful, field studies of animals are typically the only way to test hypotheses and develop realistic management strategies in disciplines such as ecology, wildlife management, and conservation biology. Such research generally must be conducted in the wild. The Animal Welfare Act (AWA 1990), Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH 2002), and the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NRC 2011) determine what practices are acceptable in animal laboratory research but are almost completely silent about ?eld research. But like nature, bureaucracy abhors a vacuum. Regulations developed for laboratory environments and domesticated taxa are increasingly extrapolated to the ?eld, even though this extrapolation is typically inappropriate because of signi?cant differences between laboratory research and ?eld research on animals (Gannon et al. 2007). Laboratory and ?eld researchers face very different moral problems.
机译:生态研究通常要求将动物包括在旨在探索生态系统功能,自律学或在日益增加的人类压力下管理和长期生存野生生物物种或种群的选择的研究中。尽管建模方法有时会有所帮助,但对动物进行野外研究通常是检验假设并开发诸如生态学,野生动植物管理和保护生物学等学科的现实管理策略的唯一方法。此类研究通常必须在野外进行。 《动物福利法》(AWA 1990),《人文关怀和实验动物使用公共卫生服务政策》(NIH 2002)和《实验动物的护理和使用指南》(NRC 2011)确定了动物实验室研究可接受的做法但是对于领域研究几乎完全保持沉默。但是,就像大自然一样,官僚主义也令人讨厌。尽管由于实验室研究和动物领域研究之间的显着差异,这种外推通常是不合适的,但针对实验室环境和驯养的分类单元制定的法规却越来越多地推论到这一领域(Gannon等,2007)。实验室和现场研究人员面临非常不同的道德问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号