首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Hypertension >Economic evaluation of home blood pressure monitoring with or without telephonic behavioral self-management in patients with hypertension.
【24h】

Economic evaluation of home blood pressure monitoring with or without telephonic behavioral self-management in patients with hypertension.

机译:有或没有电话行为自我管理的高血压患者家庭血压监测的经济评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The Take Control of Your Blood Pressure trial evaluated the effect of a multicomponent telephonic behavioral lifestyle intervention, patient self-monitoring, and both interventions combined compared with usual care on reducing systolic blood pressure during 24 months. The combined intervention led to a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure compared with usual care alone. We examined direct and patient time costs associated with each intervention. METHODS: We conducted a prospective economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial of 636 patients with hypertension participating in the study interventions. Medical costs were estimated using electronic data representing medical services delivered within the health system. Intervention-related costs were derived using information collected during the trial, administrative records, and published unit costs. RESULTS: During 24 months, patients incurred a mean of Dollars 6,965 (s.d., Dollars 22,054) in inpatient costs and Dollars 8,676 (s.d., Dollars 9,368) in outpatient costs, with no significant differences among the intervention groups. With base-case assumptions, intervention costs were estimated at Dollars 90 (s.d., Dollars 2) for home blood pressure monitoring, Dollars 345 (s.d., Dollars 64) for the behavioral intervention (Dollars 31 per telephone encounter), and Dollars 416 (s.d., Dollars 93) for the combined intervention. Patient time costs were estimated at Dollars 585 (s.d., Dollars 487) for home monitoring, Dollars 55 (s.d., Dollars 16) for the behavioral intervention, and Dollars 741 (s.d., Dollars 529) for the combined intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis demonstrated that the interventions are cost-additive to the health-care system in the short term and that patients' time costs are nontrivial.
机译:背景:“控制血压”试验评估了多成分电话行为生活方式干预,患者自我监测以及与常规护理相结合的两种干预对降低24个月收缩压的效果。与单独的常规护理相比,联合干预可显着降低收缩压。我们检查了与每次干预相关的直接和患者时间成本。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性经济评估,同时对636名参与研究干预措施的高血压患者进行了随机对照试验。医疗费用是使用代表卫生系统内提供的医疗服务的电子数据估算的。干预相关的费用是使用审判期间收集的信息,行政记录和已发布的单位费用得出的。结果:在24个月内,患者的住院费用平均为6,965美元(标准金额,22,054美元),门诊费用平均为8,676美元(标准金额,9,368美元),干预组之间无显着差异。在基本情况下,家庭血压监测的干预成本估计为90美元(标准汇率,2美元),行为干预的估算费用为345美元(标准汇率,64美元)(每次电话通话31美元),416美元(标准汇率)。 (美元93)。对于家庭监护,患者时间成本估计为585美元(标准货币,487美元),行为干预的成本估计为55美元(标准货币,16美元),联合干预的成本估计为741美元(标准货币,529美元)。结论:我们的分析表明,干预措施在短期内对卫生保健系统而言是成本增加的,并且患者的时间成本是微不足道的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号