首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Hematology >BCR/ABL level at 6 months identifies good risk CML subgroup after failing early molecular response at 3 months following imatinib therapy for CML in chronic phase
【24h】

BCR/ABL level at 6 months identifies good risk CML subgroup after failing early molecular response at 3 months following imatinib therapy for CML in chronic phase

机译:伊马替尼治疗CML慢性期3个月后早期分子反应失败后,在6个月时BCR / ABL水平确定了高风险CML亚组

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is unclear if patients with CML treated with imatinib who fail to achieve BCR/ABL transcript levels 10%IS at 3 months i.e. an early molecular response (EMR) have a better prognosis if they achieve a response by 6 months. We reviewed 320 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase receiving Imatinib therapy with 3 and 6 month BCR/ABL transcript levels available, and divided them into four groups. Group I (achieved an EMR at 3 months), Group II (did not achieve an EMR at 3 months, but achieved a transcript level of 1% at 6 months), Group III (did not achieve an EMR at 3 months, then at 6 months achieved a level between 1% and 10%) and Group IV (failed to achieve a response at 3 and 6 months). Compared to Group I, Group IV showed significantly worse freedom from treatment failure (FTF; 93.1% vs 69.0%, P 0.001), progression free survival (97.7% vs 77.3%, P 0.001) and overall survival (98.3% vs 78.9%, P 0.001). While, group III showed inferior PFS (98.3% vs 90.4%, P = 0.013) and OS (97.7% vs 90.4%, P = 0.037), but no difference in FTF (93.1% vs 92.0%, P = 0.520). There were no significant differences between Groups I and II. A BCR/ABL transcript level at 6 months can identify a "good-risk" subgroup among patients who fail to achieve an EMR on Imatinib therapy for CML.
机译:目前尚不清楚伊马替尼治疗的CML患者在3个月内未能达到BCR / ABL转录水平<10%IS,即早期分子反应(EMR)是否能在6个月内达到更好的预后。我们回顾了接受伊马替尼治疗的320例慢性期慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者,并提供了3个月和6个月的BCR / ABL转录水平,并将其分为四组。第一组(在3个月达到EMR),第二组(在3个月未达到EMR,但在6个月达到成绩单水平<1%),第三组(在3个月未达到EMR),然后在6个月时达到1%到10%之间的水平)和第IV组(在3个月到6个月时没有获得响应)。与第一组相比,第四组的治疗失败自由度(FTF; 93.1%vs 69.0%,P <0.001),无进展生存期(97.7%vs 77.3%,P <0.001)和总生存期(98.3%vs 78.9)明显较差。 %,P <0.001)。而第三组的PFS较差(98.3%vs 90.4%,P = 0.013)和OS(97.7%vs 90.4%,P = 0.037),但FTF差异无统计学意义(93.1%vs 92.0%,P = 0.520)。第一和第二组之间没有显着差异。在6个月时,BCR / ABL转录水平可以在因伊马替尼治疗CML而未能达到EMR的患者中识别出“高风险”亚组。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号