首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Fertilisers >Policy Vacuum in Indian Urea Sector
【24h】

Policy Vacuum in Indian Urea Sector

机译:印度尿素部门的政策真空

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Indian urea industry has remained highly regulated since introduction of Retention Pricing Scheme (RPS) in November, 1977. RPS was introduced after oil crisis of early 1970s which resulted in sharp increase in cost of production of fertilisers. The main objectives of RPS were to ensure viability of the fertiliser industry and availability of fertilisers to the farmers at reasonable prices. RPS prescribed a controlled maximum retail price for farmers. It also provided for calculation of cost of production of each urea unit including an element of return on net worth. It was called retention price of the units. Every unit had its own retention price. Urea units were reimbursed the difference between retention price and the farmers retail price (MRP). The policy of the RPS encouraged investment in the sector resulting in build-up of large production capacity in 1980s and 1990s. However, in its anxiety to reduce subsidy, Government kept on tightening of normative parameters and did not recognize legitimate cost on several accounts. Government did not address the basic reasons for increase in subsidy viz., higher cost of inputs, stagnant MRP over a long period and increase in consumption of fertilisers.
机译:自1977年11月实行保留定价计划(RPS)以来,印度尿素行业一直受到严格管制。1970年代初的石油危机之后引入了RPS,这导致肥料生产成本急剧上升。 RPS的主要目标是确保肥料行业的生存能力和以合理的价格向农民提供肥料。 RPS为农民规定了可控制的最高零售价格。它还提供了每个尿素单元的生产成本的计算,包括净资产收益率。称为单位保留价。每个单位都有自己的保留价。尿素单位补偿了保留价和农民零售价之间的差额。 RPS的政策鼓励对该部门的投资,从而在1980年代和1990年代建立了较大的生产能力。但是,由于急切希望减少补贴,政府继续收紧规范性参数,并且没有在几个账户上承认合法费用。政府没有解决增加补贴的根本原因,即投入成本增加,MRP长期停滞以及肥料消费量增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号