首页> 外文期刊>In vivo. >Usefulness of history-taking in non-specific abdominal pain: A prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain in Finland
【24h】

Usefulness of history-taking in non-specific abdominal pain: A prospective study of 1333 patients with acute abdominal pain in Finland

机译:进行历史记录在非特异性腹痛中的作用:芬兰1333例急性腹痛患者的前瞻性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Nonspecific abdominal pain is the commonest cause of a patient presenting to a doctor with abdominal pain of less than one week's duration. The differential diagnosis of NSAP is not always easy due to many similarities in the clinical presentation at onset and many cases may be misdiagnosed in the initial situation. To the Authors' knowledge, the diagnostic accuracy of history-taking is rarely considered in NSAP, and therefore the aim of the present study was to investigate the contribution of history-taking to correctly diagnosing NSAP in the clinical situation. Patients and Methods: The accuracy of clinical diagnosis of NSAP was studied in connection with the survey of acute abdominal pain by the Research Committee of the World Organization of Gastroenterology (OMGE). In an extension of the OMGE acute abdominal pain study, 1333 patients presenting with acute abdominal pain were included in the study. The clinical symptoms of each patient were recorded in detail, using a predefined structured data collection sheet, and the collected data were compared with the final diagnosis of the patients. Results: The most significant symptoms of NSAP in univariate analysis were: vomiting (Usefulness Index, UI=0.11, Risk Ratio, RR=2.01), progression of pain (Ul=1.10, RR=1.90), location of pain at diagnosis (UI=0.05, RR=1.75), intensity of pain (UI=0.05, RR=1.57) and previous indigestion (UI=0.05, RR=1.44). The sensitivity of the doctors' initial decision in detecting NSAP was 0.70, with a specificity of 0.83 and an efficiency of 0.77. Conclusion: The results of this study do not support a specific link between any one clinical symptom and NSAP diagnosis. However, patients with midline pain, without any increase in pain and without vomiting, and those with weak or moderate pain tended to be at risk for NSAP.
机译:背景:非特异性腹痛是导致就诊腹痛持续时间少于一周的患者的最常见原因。由于开始时临床表现的许多相似性,NSAP的鉴别诊断并不总是那么容易,而且许多情况在最初的情况下可能会被误诊。据作者所知,在NSAP中很少考虑历史记录的诊断准确性,因此,本研究的目的是调查历史记录在临床情况下对正确诊断NSAP的贡献。患者与方法:世界胃肠病学研究组织(OMGE)研究委员会结合急性腹痛调查研究了NSAP的临床诊断准确性。在OMGE急性腹痛研究的扩展中,该研究包括了1333名患有急性腹痛的患者。使用预定义的结构化数据收集表详细记录每个患者的临床症状,并将收集的数据与患者的最终诊断进行比较。结果:在单因素分析中,NSAP最显着的症状是:呕吐(有用指数,UI = 0.11,风险比,RR = 2.01),疼痛进展(Ul = 1.10,RR = 1.90),诊断时的疼痛部位(UI) = 0.05,RR = 1.75),疼痛强度(UI = 0.05,RR = 1.57)和先前的消化不良(UI = 0.05,RR = 1.44)。医生最初决定检测NSAP的敏感性为0.70,特异性为0.83,效率为0.77。结论:本研究结果不支持任何一种临床症状与NSAP诊断之间的特定联系。但是,中线疼痛,疼痛没有任何增加,没有呕吐的患者以及轻度或中度疼痛的患者往往有发生NSAP的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号