首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of cancer. >Clinical and pathological response rates of docetaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer and comparison with anthracycline-based chemotherapies: Eight-year experience from single centre
【24h】

Clinical and pathological response rates of docetaxel-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer and comparison with anthracycline-based chemotherapies: Eight-year experience from single centre

机译:基于多西他赛的新辅助化疗在局部晚期乳腺癌中的临床和病理学应答率以及与基于蒽环类药物的化疗的比较:单中心八年经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: The administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) prior to local therapy is advantageous for women with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), since it can render inoperable tumors resectable and can increase rates of breast conservative surgeries. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed LABC patients who received NACT from January 2000 to December 2007. Out of 3000 case records screened, 570 (19%) were LABC and 110/570 (19%) treatment-nave patients started on NACT were analyzed. Ninety-one (37 docetaxel [D], 54 anthracycline [A]) patients were eligible for response and survival analysis. Pathological complete remission (pCR) was defined as no evidence of malignancy in both breast and axilla. Results: Median age of the whole cohort was 45 years (range 25-68 years). Premenopausal were 42% and estrogen receptor + 49.5%. Most (90%) were T4 tumors and 70% were Stage IIIB. Median numbers of preoperative cycles were six and three in the D and A group respectively. Overall clinical response rates for breast primary were 74.3% and 53.7% (CR 28.6% vs. 16.7%, P=0.58) while for axilla ORR were 75.7% vs. 54.8% (51.4% vs. 40.4% CR, P=0.77) respectively for D and A. Corresponding pCR rates were 19% vs. 13% respectively. There was no significant difference in disease-free (three-year 56.84% vs. 61.16%, P=0.80) and overall survival (three-year 70% vs. 78.5%, P=0.86) between the two groups. Conclusions: Although pCR rates were higher with docetaxel-based NACT, it did not translate into superior disease-free survival/overall survival compared to anthracycline-based chemotherapies.
机译:简介:在局部治疗之前进行新辅助化疗(NACT)对局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)的女性有利,因为它可以使无法手术的肿瘤切除,并可以提高保守乳腺癌的手术率。资料和方法:我们回顾性分析了2000年1月至2007年12月接受NACT的LABC患者。在筛查的3000例病例记录中,分析了570例(19%)的LABC和110/570例(19%)接受NACT治疗的初诊患者。九十一名患者(37名多西他赛[D],54名蒽环类[A])符合反应和生存分析要求。病理完全缓解(pCR)的定义是在乳房和腋窝均无恶性证据。结果:整个队列的中位年龄为45岁(范围为25-68岁)。绝经前为42%,雌激素受体为49.5%。大多数(90%)是T4肿瘤,而70%是IIIB期。 D组和A组的术前周期中位数分别为6和3。乳腺原发癌的总体临床缓解率为74.3%和53.7%(CR 28.6%vs. 16.7%,P = 0.58),而腋窝ORR则为75.7%vs.54.8%(51.4%vs.40.4%CR,P = 0.77)对于D和A,相应的pCR率分别为19%和13%。两组的无病率(三年期56.84%vs. 61.16%,P = 0.80)和总生存率(三年期70%vs. 78.5%,P = 0.86)无显着差异。结论:尽管基于多西他赛的NACT的pCR率较高,但与基于蒽环类药物的化学疗法相比,它的无病生存/总生存率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号