...
首页> 外文期刊>Breast care >Iniparib in Phase III - Significant Setback for Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer
【24h】

Iniparib in Phase III - Significant Setback for Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer

机译:Iniparib进入第三阶段-三阴性乳腺癌患者的显着挫折

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: A randomized phase II study in mTNBC suggested that iniparib (I), an anticancer agent with PARP inhibitory activity, added to GC improved overall survival (OS), without potentiating GC toxicity (O'Shaughnessy et al. NEJM 2011). This confirmatory study evaluated the safety and efficacy of GC with or without I in a similar mTNBC pt population. Methods: This randomized, open-label phase III study enrolled pts >18 years with mTNBC, measurable disease, and <2 prior cy to toxic regimens for metastatic TNBC. Pts were stratified based on having 0 vs. 1-2 prior metastatic therapies. Pts were randomized (1:1) to GC alone or GCI. G (1000 mg/m~2; IV) and C (AUC 2; IV) were given on days 1 and 8, and I (5.6 mg/kg; IV) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 every 21 days. Upon central confirmation of disease progression on GC, crossover to GCI was permitted. Primary endpoints were OS and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were objective response rate and safety. Results: Between July 2009 and March 2010, 519 pts were randomized. Pt characteristics were balanced between the two arms. The study did not meet the criteria for significance for co-primary endpoints of OS and PFS. Efficacy results in pts stratified by line of therapy (57% in 1st line; 43% in 2nd or 3rd line) will be presented. 152 of 258 GC pts (59%) crossed over to receive GCI following disease progression. Most frequently occurring grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (53% [GC] vs. 61% [GCI]), anemia (22% vs. 18%), thrombocytopenia (24% vs. 28%), and leukopenia (15% vs. 16%). Overall, addition of I did not significantly add to the toxicity profile of GC alone. Conclusions: Although this study demonstrated a consistent safety profile to that of the phase II study, addition of I to GC did not meet the pre-specified criteria for significance for co-primary endpoints of OS and PFS in pts with mTNBC. Analyses aimed at further elucidating these findings are ongoing (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00938652).
机译:背景:mTNBC中的一项随机II期研究表明,具有iparp抑制活性的抗癌药iniparib(I)添加到GC中可改善总体存活率(OS),而不会增强GC毒性(O'Shaughnessy等,NEJM 2011)。这项验证性研究评估了在类似的mTNBC pt人群中有或没有I的GC的安全性和有效性。方法:这项随机,开放标签的III期研究招募了≥18岁的患有mTNBC,可测量的疾病和<2年前接受过转移性TNBC毒性治疗的患者。根据0到1-2个先前的转移疗法对点进行分层。将Pts随机(1:1)分配给单独使用GC或GCI。每21天分别在第1天和第8天给予G(1000 mg / m〜2; IV)和C(AUC 2; IV),在第1、4、8和11天给予I(5.6 mg / kg; IV) 。在通过GC集中确认疾病进展后,允许转用GCI。主要终点是OS和无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点是客观反应率和安全性。结果:2009年7月至2010年3月,随机抽取519分。两臂之间的铂金特性平衡。该研究不符合OS和PFS共同主要终点的重要意义标准。将显示按治疗线分层的pts疗效结果(第一线占57%;第二线或第三线占43%)。 258名患者中有152名(59%)在疾病进展后越过接受GCI。最常见的3/4级不良事件包括中性粒细胞减少症(53%[GC]比61%[GCI]),贫血(22%比18%),血小板减少症(24%比28%)和白细胞减少症(15 %和16%)。总体而言,添加I不会显着增加单独GC的毒性。结论:尽管该研究证明了与II期研究一致的安全性,但在GC中添加I并不符合预先确定的标准,即与mTNBC的患者OS和PFS共同主要终点的重要性有关。旨在进一步阐明这些发现的分析正在进行中(clinicaltrials.gov:NCT00938652)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号