...
首页> 外文期刊>IFLA Journal >New international treaty to strengthen protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict, The Hague, 15-26 March 1999
【24h】

New international treaty to strengthen protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict, The Hague, 15-26 March 1999

机译:发生武装冲突时加强对文化财产的保护的新国际条约,1999年3月15日至26日,海牙

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The following report was submitted by Patrick Boylan, who was Head of the International Committee of the Blue Shield Delegation, Diplomatic Conference, The Hague, 15-26 March 1999. He may be contacted by e-mail at p.boylan@city.ac.uk. After two gruelling weeks, 15-26 March 1999, during which things often looked very bleak because of deep-seated differences between States, a new 2nd Protocol to the 1954 Hague Convention on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event ofArmed Conflict was adopted by unanimous consensus on the evening of Friday, 26 March in The Hague. So far as I could see the Heads of all 84 national Delegations taking part signed the "Final Act" of the Diplomatic Conference - though this does not commit any State to sign and ratify the new treaty itself: this will depend on often prolonged consideration and major new primary legislation at the national level in each case. The new Protocol represents the greatest advance in international cultural protection measure for decades - certainly since the 1972 World Heritage Convention, and probably since the original 1954 Hague Convention. It is also the most substantial development in the field of International Humanitarian Law since the Geneva Convention Additional Protocols of 1977. Both the World Heritage Convention and the 1977 Additional Protocols offered significant precedents for many of the innovations in the 1999 2nd Protocol just adopted, coupled with the long and sad experience of the failure of the original 1954 Convention to prevent great losses of important cultural property over the past 45 years, especially in the sort of "dirty" armed conflicts such as civil wars that have been a constant feature of the post-war world.
机译:以下报告是1999年3月15日至26日在海牙举行的外交会议蓝盾代表团国际委员会主任帕特里克·博伊兰(Patrick Boylan)提交的。请通过电子邮件与他联系:p.boylan@city.ac .uk。经过两个艰苦的星期,1999年3月15日至26日,由于国家之间的根深蒂固的分歧,事情常常显得十分黯淡,1954年通过了新的《 1954年海牙关于保护文化财产的海牙公约的第二议定书》, 3月26日星期五晚上在海牙,各方达成了共识。据我所知,所有84个国家代表团团长都参加了外交会议的《最后法案》,尽管这并没有任何国家承诺签署和批准新条约本身:这将取决于长期的审议和批准。在每种情况下,国家一级的主要新的主要立法。新议定书代表了几十年来国际文化保护措施的最大进步,这肯定是自1972年《世界遗产公约》以来,也可能自1954年最初的《海牙公约》以来。这也是自1977年《日内瓦公约》附加议定书以来国际人道主义法领域最重大的发展。《世界遗产公约》和1977年《附加议定书》为刚刚通过并结合了1999年第二议定书的许多创新提供了重要先例。过去1954年《公约》未能防止重要文化财产在过去45年中遭受重大损失,这是长期而悲惨的经历,尤其是在诸如内战之类的“肮脏”武装冲突中,这一直是该国的长期特征。战后世界。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号