首页> 外文期刊>Biocontrol Science and Technology >Flowers for better pest control? Ground cover plants enhance apple orchard spiders (Araneae), but not necessarily their impact on pests.
【24h】

Flowers for better pest control? Ground cover plants enhance apple orchard spiders (Araneae), but not necessarily their impact on pests.

机译:花可以更好地控制害虫?地被植物可增强苹果园蜘蛛(Araneae)的生长能力,但不一定会对害虫产生影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Effects of ground cover upon arboreal spiders and their ability to control pests were studied in an apple orchard over six years. The ground cover treatments were: (1) annual and perennial flowering herbs (FLOWER), (2) regularly mowed grass (GRASS) and (3) weed-free bare ground (BAREgr) in the alleys. Spider abundance and species richness increased significantly in FLOWER compared to BAREgr, with GRASS being intermediate between the other two treatments. The effects of ground cover vegetation varied across spider guilds and individual species. The number of stalkers (Salticidae) increased sharply with the amount of vegetation in the alleys, while the increase was much less steep in ambushers (mainly Thomisidae and Philodromidae), and we found no significant difference between the treatments in space web builders (Theridiidae) and orb web builders (mainly Araneidae). The spider community was dominated by the intraguild predator Carrhotus xanthogramma (Salticidae), which showed a 3.5-fold increase in FLOWER compared to BAREgr and represented 40, 54 and 63% of the total spider abundance in BAREgr, GRASS and FLOWER treatments, respectively. The other species were less numerous and their response to FLOWER compared to BAREgr treatments ranged from a ninefold increase to a sixfold decrease. Within potential prey groups, hymenopteran parasitoids, dipterans and Auchenorrhyncha were the best predictors of spider abundance. In contrast, the abundance of apple pests was independent of spider density and showed no difference between treatments, indicating that spiders in the studied orchard had little impact on the size of the pest populations. This study demonstrates that functional traits and abundances of spider guilds and species, rather than the total spider abundance per se, might explain the success or failure of spiders in conservation biological control.
机译:在苹果园中研究了地面覆盖物对树栖蜘蛛的影响及其防治害虫的能力,历时六年。地被的处理方法是:(1)一年生和多年生开花药草(FLOWER),(2)定期割草(GRASS)和(3)小巷中的无杂草裸露地面(BAREgr)。与BAREgr相比,FLOWER中蜘蛛的丰度和物种丰富度显着增加,而GRASS在其他两种处理之间处于中间水平。地表植被的影响因蜘蛛行会和单个物种而异。随行者的数量随行道上植被的增加而急剧增加,而埋伏者(主要是omi科和Phil科)的上升幅度则要小得多,而且我们发现空间网建造者(rid科)的处理方法之间无显着差异。和orb网站建设者(主要是Araneidae)。蜘蛛群落由公会内的捕食者Carrhotus xanthogramma(Salticidae)所支配,与BAREgr相比,该物种的FLOWER增加了3.5倍,分别占BAREgr,GRASS和FLOWER处理中蜘蛛总数的40、54和63%。与BAREgr处理相比,其他物种数量较少,并且对花的反应从增加9倍到减少6倍不等。在潜在的猎物群中,膜翅目寄生虫,双翅类动物和Auchenorrhyncha是蜘蛛丰度的最佳预测因子。相比之下,苹果害虫的丰度与蜘蛛密度无关,并且在处理之间没有差异,表明研究果园中的蜘蛛对害虫种群的大小影响很小。这项研究表明,蜘蛛行会和物种的功能特征和丰度,而不是蜘蛛本身的总丰度,可以解释蜘蛛在保护生物控制方面的成败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号