...
首页> 外文期刊>Animal Genetics >Transcriptome comparison in the pituitary-adrenal axis between Beagle and Chinese Field dogs after chronic stress exposure
【24h】

Transcriptome comparison in the pituitary-adrenal axis between Beagle and Chinese Field dogs after chronic stress exposure

机译:长期应激暴露后比格犬和中国野狗垂体-肾上腺轴转录组比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chronic stress can induce a series of maladjustments, and the response to stress is partly regulated by the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic mechanisms of this axis regulating stress responsiveness. The pituitary and adrenal cortex of Beagle and Chinese Field Dog (CFD) from a stress exposure group [including Beagle pituitary 1 (BP1), CFD pituitary 1 (CFDP1), Beagle adrenal cortex 1 (BAC1), CFD adrenal cortex 1 (CFDAC1)] and a control group [including Beagle pituitary 2 (BP2), CFD pituitary 2 (CFDP2), Beagle adrenal cortex 2 (BAC2), CFD adrenal cortex 2 (CFDAC2)], selected to perform RNA-seq transcriptome comparisons, showed that 40, 346, 376, 69, 70, 38, 57 and 71 differentially expressed genes were detected in BP1 vs. BP2, CFDP1 vs. CFDP2, BP1 vs. CFDP1, BP2 vs. CFDP2, BAC1 vs. BAC2, CFDAC1 vs. CFDAC2, BAC1 vs. CFDAC1 and BAC2 vs. CFDAC2 respectively. NPB was a gene common to BAC1 vs. BAC2 and CFDAC1 vs. CFDAC2, indicating it was a potential gene affecting response to chronic stress, regardless of the extent of chronic stress induced. PLP1 was a gene common to BP1 vs. CFDP1 and BP2 vs. CFDP2, suggesting its important roles in affecting the stress-tolerance difference between the two breeds, regardless of whether there was stress exposure or not. Pathway analysis found 12, 4, 11 and 1 enriched pathway in the comparisons of BP1 vs. CFDP1, BP2 vs. CFDP2, CFDP1 vs. CFDP2 and BAC1 vs. BAC2 respectively. Glutamatergic synapse, neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, retrograde endocannabinoid signaling, GABAergic synapse, calcium signaling pathway and dopaminergic synapse were the most significantly enriched pathways in both CFDP1 vs. CFDP2 and BP1 vs. CFDP1. GO, KEGG pathway and gene network analysis demonstrated that GRIA3, GRIN2A, GRIN2B and NPY were important in regulating the stress response in CFD. Nevertheless, ADORA1, CAMK2A, GRM1, GRM7 and NR4A1 might be critical genes contributing to the stress-tolerance difference between CFD and Beagle when subjected to stress exposure. In addition, RGS4 and SYN1 might play important roles both in regulating the stress response in CFD and in affecting the stress-tolerance difference in different breeds. These observations clearly showed that some genes in the adrenal cortex and pituitary could regulate the stress response in Beagle and CFDs, whereas some others could affect the stress-tolerance difference between these two breeds. Our results can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the genetic mechanisms of response to chronic stress.
机译:慢性应激会引起一系列适应不良,对应激的反应部分受下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴的调节。这项研究的目的是调查该轴调节压力反应性的遗传机制。来自压力暴露组的Beagle和中华野犬(CFD)的垂体和肾上腺皮质[包括Beagle垂体1(BP1),CFD垂体1(CFDP1),Beagle肾上腺皮质1(BAC1),CFD肾上腺皮质1(CFDAC1) ]和一个对照组[包括Beagle垂体2(BP2),CFD垂体2(CFDP2),Beagle肾上腺皮质2(BAC2),CFD肾上腺皮质2(CFDAC2)],选择进行RNA-seq转录组比较,结果显示40分别在BP1与BP2,CFDP1与CFDP2,BP1与CFDP1,BP2与CFDP2,BAC1与BAC2,CFDAC1与CFDAC2, BAC1对CFDAC1和BAC2对CFDAC2。 NPB是BAC1与BAC2和CFDAC1与CFDAC2共有的基因,表明它是一个潜在的基因,可影响对慢性应激的反应,而与诱导的慢性应激程度无关。 PLP1是BP1 vs. CFDP1和BP2 vs. CFDP2共有的基因,表明它在影响两个品种之间的耐压差异方面具有重要作用,无论是否存在胁迫暴露。路径分析分别在BP1与CFDP1,BP2与CFDP2,CFDP1与CFDP2和BAC1与BAC2的比较中发现了12、4、11和1条富集的路径。谷氨酸能突触,神经活性配体-受体相互作用,逆行内源性大麻素信号传导,GABA能突触,钙信号传导途径和多巴胺能突触是CFDP1与CFDP2和BP1与CFDP1中最丰富的途径。 GO,KEGG途径和基因网络分析表明,GRIA3,GRIN2A,GRIN2B和NPY在调节CFD应激反应中很重要。但是,ADORA1,CAMK2A,GRM1,GRM7和NR4A1可能是导致CFD和Beagle承受压力暴露时的耐压差异的关键基因。此外,RGS4和SYN1可能在调节CFD中的应激反应以及影响不同品种的耐性差异中起重要作用。这些观察清楚地表明,肾上腺皮质和垂体中的某些基因可以调节比格犬和CFD中的应激反应,而另一些则可以影响这两个品种之间的应激耐受性差异。我们的结果可以有助于更全面地了解对慢性应激反应的遗传机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号