首页> 外文期刊>IEE proceedings, Part K. Vision, image and signal processing >Survey and comparative analysis of entropy and relative entropy thresholding techniques
【24h】

Survey and comparative analysis of entropy and relative entropy thresholding techniques

机译:熵和相对熵阈值技术的调查和比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Entropy-based image thresholding has received considerable interest in recent years. Two types of entropy are generally used as thresholding criteria: Shannon's entropy and relative entropy, also known as Kullback-Leibler information distance, where the former measures uncertainty in an information source with an optimal threshold obtained by maximising Shannon's entropy, whereas the latter measures the information discrepancy between two different sources with an optimal threshold obtained by minimising relative entropy. Many thresholding methods have been developed for both criteria and reported in the literature. These two entropy-based thresholding criteria have been investigated and the relationship among entropy and relative entropy thresholding methods has been explored. In particular, a survey and comparative analysis is conducted among several widely used methods that include Pun and Kapur's maximum entropy, Kittler and Illingworth's minimum error thresholding, Pal and Pal's entropy thresholding and Chang et al.'s relative entropy thresholding methods. In order to objectively assess these methods, two measures, uniformity and shape, are used for performance evaluation.
机译:近年来,基于熵的图像阈值处理引起了人们的极大兴趣。通常将两种类型的熵用作阈值准则:Shannon熵和相对熵,也称为Kullback-Leibler信息距离,其中前者使用最大化Shannon熵获得的最佳阈值来衡量信息源中的不确定性,而后者则通过通过最小化相对熵获得具有最佳阈值的两个不同源之间的信息差异。已经针对这两种标准开发了许多阈值方法,并且在文献中已有报道。研究了这两种基于熵的阈值准则,并探讨了熵与相对熵阈值方法之间的关系。特别是,对几种广泛使用的方法进行了调查和比较分析,包括Pun和Kapur的最大熵,Kittler和Illingworth的最小误差阈值,Pal和Pal的熵阈值以及Chang等人的相对熵阈值方法。为了客观地评估这些方法,使用两种方法(均匀性和形状)进行性能评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号