...
首页> 外文期刊>Breast cancer research and treatment. >A randomized phase-III trial of docetaxel/capecitabine versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide as primary chemotherapy for patients with stage II/III breast cancer.
【24h】

A randomized phase-III trial of docetaxel/capecitabine versus doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide as primary chemotherapy for patients with stage II/III breast cancer.

机译:多西他赛/卡培他滨与阿霉素/环磷酰胺作为II / III期乳腺癌患者的主要化疗的III期随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We aimed to determine the efficacies of a non-anthracycline-containing regimen, docetaxel/capecitabine (TX), in comparison with an anthracycline-containing regimen, doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC), as primary chemotherapy for node-positive early stage breast cancer. In this phase-III single center randomized study, we randomized 209 women with axillary node positive, stage II/III breast cancer to receive four cycles of either TX or AC followed by surgery and cross-over to the other treatment as an adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was tumor pathologic complete response (pCR). Clinical response rates, toxicity profiles, disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival were secondary objectives. In total, 204 patients had clinical and radiological evaluation of response, and underwent surgery. Compared with AC, TX increased pCR in primary tumors (21% vs. 10%, respectively, P = 0.024) and clinical response (84% vs. 65%, P = 0.003). TX was associated with less nausea and vomiting, but more stomatitis, diarrhea, myalgia, and skinail changes than AC. With a median follow-up of 37 months, there was no significant difference in DFS by treatment groups (P = 0.932). Fewer patients developed recurrence who achieved pCR in lymph node (LN) (P = 0.025; hazard ratio, 0.189; 95% CI, 0.044-0.815) in the multivariate analysis. TX showed superior efficacies to AC with increased pathologic and clinical complete response rates. Although these findings did not translate into a gain in DFS, the patients who achieved pCR in LN developed significantly less recurrence.
机译:我们旨在确定非蒽环类方案多西他赛/卡培他滨(TX)与含蒽环类方案多柔比星/环磷酰胺(AC)相比,作为淋巴结阳性早期乳腺癌的主要化疗方法的疗效。在此III期单中心随机研究中,我们将209例腋窝淋巴结阳性,II / III期乳腺癌的妇女随机分配为接受TX或AC四个周期的治疗,然后手术并转为其他治疗作为辅助治疗。主要终点是肿瘤病理完全缓解(pCR)。次要目标是临床缓解率,毒性反应,无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期。总共204例患者接受了临床和放射学评估,并接受了手术。与AC相比,TX增加了原发肿瘤中的pCR(分别为21%和10%,P = 0.024)和临床反应(84%和65%,P = 0.003)。与AC相比,TX与较少的恶心和呕吐相关,但更多的是口腔炎,腹泻,肌痛和皮肤/指甲改变。中位随访时间为37个月,各治疗组的DFS差异无统计学意义(P = 0.932)。在多变量分析中,较少复发的患者在淋巴结(LN)达到pCR(P = 0.025;危险比,0.189; 95%CI,0.044-0.815)。 TX表现出优于AC的疗效,并具有更高的病理和临床完全缓解率。尽管这些发现并未转化为DFS的增加,但在LN中实现pCR的患者复发率明显降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号