首页> 外文期刊>Ichnos: an international journal for plant and animal traces >Tetrapod Footprint Biostratigraphy and Biochronology
【24h】

Tetrapod Footprint Biostratigraphy and Biochronology

机译:四足动物足迹生物地层学和生物年代学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Tetrapod footprints have a fossil record in rocks of Devonian-Neogene age. Three principal factors limit their use in biostratigraphy and biochronology (palichnostratigraphy): invalid ichnotaxa based on extramorphological variants, slow apparent evolutionary turnover rates and facies restrictions. The ichnotaxonomy of tetrapod footprints has generally been oversplit, largely due to a failure to appreciate extramorphological variation. Thus, many tetrapod footprint ichnogenera and most ichnospecies are useless phantom taxa that confound biostratigraphic correlation and biochronological subdivision. Tracks rarely allow identification of a genus or species known from the body fossil record. Indeed, almost all tetrapod footprint ichnogenera are equivalent to a family or a higher taxon (order, superorder, etc.) based on body fossils. This means that ichnogenera necessarily have much longer temporal ranges and therefore slower apparent evolutionary turnover rates than do body fossil genera. Because of this, footprints cannot provide as refined a subdivision of geological time as do body fossils. The tetrapod footprint record is much more facies controlled than the tetrapod body fossil record. The relatively narrow facies window for track preservation, and the fact that tracks are almost never transported, redeposited or reworked, limits the facies that can be correlated with any track-based biostratigraphy. A Devonian-Neogene global biochronology based on tetrapod footprints generally resolves geologic time about 20 to 50 percent as well as does the tetrapod body fossil record. The following globally recognizable time intervals can be based on the track record: (1) Late Devonian; (2) Mississippian; (3) Early-Middle Pennsylvanian; (4) Late Pennsylvanian; (5) Early Permian; (6) Late Permian; (7) Early-Middle Triassic; (8) late Middle Triassic; (9) Late Triassic; (10) Early Jurassic; (11) Middle-Late Jurassic; (12) Early Cretaceous; (13) Late Cretaceous; (14) Paleogene; (15) Neogene. Tetrapod footprints are most valuable in establishing biostratigraphic datum points, and this is their primary value to understanding the stratigraphic (temporal) dimension of tetrapod evolution.
机译:四足动物的脚印在泥盆纪-新近纪时代的岩石中有化石记录。三个主要因素限制了它们在生物地层学和生物年代学(古生物学地层学)中的使用:基于形态外变体的无效鱼鳞生物,缓慢的表观进化转换率和相限制。通常,四足动物脚印的鸟类分类学被过度分割,这主要是由于未能欣赏到形态外的变化。因此,许多四足动物足迹鱼鳞纲和大多数鱼鳞科是无用的幻影类群,混淆了生物地层学相关性和生物年代学细分。痕迹很少能识别出人体化石记录中已知的属或种。的确,几乎所有四足动物足迹的鱼腥草都等同于基于化石的一个家庭或一个更高的分类单元(有序,超序等)。这意味着鱼腥草的时间范围必定要长得多,因此其表观进化转换率要比身体化石属慢。因此,脚印无法像人体化石一样精细地提供地质时间的细分。与四足动物的化石记录相比,四足动物的足迹记录受更多的相控。相对较窄的相迹窗口保存轨迹,以及几乎从不运输,重新沉积或重新加工轨迹的事实,限制了可与任何基于轨迹的生物地层学相关的相。基于四足动物足迹的泥盆纪-新近纪全球生物年代学通常可以解决约20%至50%的地质时间以及四足动物的化石记录。以下是全球公认的时间间隔可以基于记录:(1)晚泥盆纪; (2)密西西比州; (3)宾夕法尼亚州中早期; (4)晚宾夕法尼亚州; (5)早二叠纪; (6)晚二叠世; (7)早中三叠世; (8)中三叠世晚期; (9)晚三叠世; (10)侏罗纪早期; (11)侏罗纪晚期; (12)早白垩世; (13)晚白垩世; (14)古近纪; (15)新基因。四脚架的足迹对于建立生物地层基准点最有价值,这是了解四足动物演化的地层(时间)维度的主要价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号