...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of science >Ptolemy's ancient planetary observations
【24h】

Ptolemy's ancient planetary observations

机译:托勒密的古代行星观测

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Almagest of Ptolemy (mid-second century AD) contains eleven dated reports of observations of the positions of planets made during the third century BC in Babylon and Hellenistic Egypt. The present paper investigates the character, purpose, and conventions of the observational programmes from which these reports derive, the channels of their transmission to Ptolemy's time, and the fidelity of Ptolemy's presentation of them. Like the Babylonian observational programme, about which we have considerable knowledge through cuneiform documents, the Greco-Egyptian ones were not directed towards the deduction of mathematical models of celestial motion but appear to have investigated patterns, correlations, and periodicities of phenomena. Ptolemy's immediate sources most likely were not the original series of observational records, but treatises by various astronomers of the intervening four centuries, including Hipparchus. While Ptolemy does not appear to have tampered with the wording of the reports, he faced difficulties and uncertainties in interpreting them; critically, he lacked sufficiently detailed information about the ancient calendars to be able to convert the reported dates accurately into his own chronological framework based on the Egyptian calendar.
机译:托勒密(Altoest of Ptolemy)(公元二世纪中叶)包含了十一份过时的报告,记录了公元前三世纪在巴比伦和希腊化埃及的行星位置。本文研究了这些报告所源自的观测计划的特征,目的和约定,它们向托勒密时代传播的渠道以及托勒密介绍它们的真实性。就像巴比伦的观测程序一样,通过楔形文字我们对此有相当的了解,希腊-埃及的观测程序并非旨在推论天体运动的数学模型,而是研究了现象的模式,相关性和周期性。托勒密的直接来源很可能不是原始的观测记录系列,而是介入这四个世纪的各种天文学家的论文,包括希帕基斯。尽管托勒密似乎并未篡改报告的措词,但他在解释报告时面临困难和不确定性。至关重要的是,他缺乏有关古代日历的足够详细的信息,无法将报告的日期准确地转换为基于埃及日历的自己的时间框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号