...
首页> 外文期刊>Aviation, space, and environmental medicine. >Fear of flying treatment methods: virtual reality exposure vs. cognitive behavioral therapy.
【24h】

Fear of flying treatment methods: virtual reality exposure vs. cognitive behavioral therapy.

机译:对飞行治疗方法的恐惧:虚拟现实暴露与认知行为治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Fear of flying (FOF) can be a serious problem for individuals who develop this condition and for military and civilian organizations that operate aircraft. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three treatments: bibliotherapy (BIB) without therapist contact; individualized virtual reality exposure therapy (VRE); and cognitive behavior therapy (CB). In addition, we evaluated the effect of following up VRE and CB with 2 d of group cognitive-behavioral training (GrCB). METHODS: There were 86 subjects suffering from FOF who entered the study; 19 BIB, 29 VRE, and 16 CB subjects completed the treatment protocols. The BIB subjects were then treated with VRE (n = 7) or CB (n = 12). There were 59 subjects who were then trained with GrCB. RESULTS: Treatment with VRE or CB was more effective than BIB. Both VRE and CB showed a decline in FOF on the two main outcome measures. There was no statistically significant difference between those two therapies. However, effect sizes were lower for VRE (small to moderate) than for CB (moderate) and the addition of GrCB had less effect for VRE than for CB. DISCUSSION: VRE holds promise as treatment for FOF, but in this trial CB followed by GrCB showed the largest decrease in subjective anxiety. The results suggest that future research should focus on comparing the effectiveness of VRE vs. VRE plus cognitive techniques or measure the effectiveness of each component of treatment. Moreover, the effectiveness of the GrCB as stand-alone treatment should be investigated, which might even be superior in cost-effectiveness.
机译:简介:飞行恐惧(FOF)对于形成这种情况的个人以及操作飞机的军事和民用组织可能是一个严重的问题。这项研究的目的是比较三种治疗的有效性:没有治疗师联系的书目治疗(BIB);个性化虚拟现实暴露疗法(VRE);和认知行为疗法(CB)。此外,我们评估了2 d小组认知行为训练(GrCB)对VRE和CB的随访效果。方法:共有86名患有FOF的受试者进入了研究。 19位BIB,29位VRE和16位CB受试者完成了治疗方案。然后用VRE(n = 7)或CB(n = 12)治疗BIB受试者。然后有59名受试者接受了GrCB的培训。结果:VRE或CB治疗比BIB更有效。在两个主要结果指标上,VRE和CB均显示FOF下降。这两种疗法之间没有统计学上的显着差异。但是,VRE(中小)的效果大小要比CB(中度)要小,并且添加GrCB对VRE的影响要小于CB。讨论:VRE有望作为FOF的治疗方法,但在该试验中,CB其次是GrCB显示主观焦虑的下降最大。结果表明,未来的研究应侧重于比较VRE与VRE加上认知技术的有效性,或衡量治疗各组成部分的有效性。此外,应研究GrCB作为独立治疗的有效性,其成本效益甚至更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号