首页> 外文期刊>Australian Resources and Energy Law Journal >THE FUNCTIONS AND POWERS OF THE WARDEN OF MINES IN OPEN COURT AND THE REFORM OF WARDEN'S COURT PROCEDURE UNDER THE MINING ACT 1978 (WA)
【24h】

THE FUNCTIONS AND POWERS OF THE WARDEN OF MINES IN OPEN COURT AND THE REFORM OF WARDEN'S COURT PROCEDURE UNDER THE MINING ACT 1978 (WA)

机译:1978年《矿业法》(WA)规定的露天法庭的监护人的职能和权力以及监护人程序的改革

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the functions of the warden of mines, convened in "open court" and the "warden's court" and analyses the terminology used in the Mining Act 1978 (WA). It considers the key court decisions that have delineated the powers and procedures currently available before the warden of mines in open court. The analysis shows that far from being a "toothless tiger" the warden does have some powers in administrative proceedings to ensure that procedural fairness is afforded to tenement applicants, tenement holders and plaintiff-objectors. It is suggested that the current situation in the warden's administrative jurisdiction in Western Australia is unsatisfactory. This paper advocates urgent reform of both substantive and procedural mining laws relating to the administrative and judicial functions of the warden. It outlines core procedural rules that should be available to the warden of mines to ensure that efficiency, certainty and transparency are characteristics of warden's court proceedings.
机译:本文研究了在“公开法庭”和“看守法庭”中召集的地雷监护人的职能,并分析了《 1978年采矿法》(WA)中使用的术语。它考虑了在公开法庭上由地雷监护人掌握的主要法院判决,这些判决描述了当前可用的权力和程序。分析表明,监护人在行政诉讼中确实具有一定的权力,可以确保向物业申请人,物业所有人和原告反对者提供程序公正性,而不是使其成为“无牙老虎”。有人提出,西澳大利亚州监狱长的行政管辖区的现状并不令人满意。本文主张紧急改革与看守人的行政和司法职能有关的实体和程序采矿法。它概述了矿山管理员应使用的核心程序规则,以确保效率,确定性和透明度是管理员的法院诉讼程序的特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号