...
首页> 外文期刊>Australian journal of primary health >Effect of health insurance on the utilisation of allied health services by people with chronic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Effect of health insurance on the utilisation of allied health services by people with chronic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:健康保险对慢性病患者利用专职医疗服务的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Allied health services benefit the management of many chronic diseases. The effects of health insurance on the utilisation of allied health services has not yet been established despite health insurance frequently being identified as a factor promoting utilisation of medical and hospital services among people with chronic disease. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish the effects of health insurance on the utilisation of allied health services by people with chronic disease. Medline (Ovid Medline 1948 to Present with Daily Update), EMBASE (1980 to 1 April 2011), CINAHL, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched to 12 April 2011 inclusive. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were published in English, randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental trials, quantitative observational studies and included people with one or more chronic diseases using allied health services and health insurance. A full-text review was performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses were conducted. One hundred and fifty-eight citations were retrieved and seven articles were included in the meta-analyses. The pooled odds ratio (95% CI) of having insurance (versus no insurance) on the utilisation of allied health services among people with chronic disease was 1.33 (1.16-1.52; P< 0.001). There was a significant effect of insurance on the utilisation of non-physiotherapy services, pooled odds ratio (95% Cl) 4.80 (1.46-15.79; P = 0.01) but having insurance compared with insurance of a lesser coverage was not significantly associated with an increase in physiotherapy utilisation, pooled odds ratio (95% CI) 1.53 (0.81 -2.91; P = 0.19). The presence of co-morbidity or functional limitation and higher levels of education increased utilisation whereas gender, race, marital status and income had a limited and variable effect, according to the study population. The review was limited by the considerable heterogeneity in the research questions being asked, sample sizes, study methodology (including allied health service), insurance type and dependent variables analysed. The presence of health insurance was generally associated with increased utilisation of allied health services; however, this varied depending on the population, provider type and insurance product.
机译:专职医疗服务有益于许多慢性病的管理。尽管健康保险经常被认为是促进慢性病患者利用医疗和医院服务的一个因素,但尚未确定健康保险对相关健康服务利用的影响。该系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是确定健康保险对慢性病患者利用专职医疗服务的影响。检索了Medline(Ovid Medline 1948年至今,每日更新),EMBASE(1980年至2011年4月1日),CINAHL,PsychINFO和Cochrane中央对照试验注册簿,截止日期为2011年4月12日。如果研究以英文发表,随机对照试验,准实验性试验,定量观察性研究,并且使用联合医疗服务和健康保险对患有一种或多种慢性疾病的人进行了研究,则符合纳入条件。由两名审阅者独立进行了全文审阅。进行荟萃分析。检索到158篇文献,荟萃分析中包括七篇文章。有保险(与没有保险)相比,在慢性病患者中使用联合健康服务的综合赔率(95%CI)为1.33(1.16-1.52; P <0.001)。保险对非理疗服务的使用有显着影响,合并赔率比(95%Cl)4.80(1.46-15.79; P = 0.01),但与保险范围较小的保险相比,保险与物理疗法利用率的增加,合并优势比(95%CI)1.53(0.81 -2.91; P = 0.19)。根据研究人群,并存病或功能受限以及较高的教育水平提高了利用率,而性别,种族,婚姻状况和收入影响有限且易变。由于所询问的研究问题,样本量,研究方法(包括专职医疗服务),保险类型和所分析的因变量之间存在很大的异质性,因此审查受到了限制。健康保险的存在通常与联合医疗服务的利用增加有关;但是,这取决于人口,提供者类型和保险产品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号