...
首页> 外文期刊>Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology >Avoidable risk factors in perinatal deaths: A perinatal audit in South Australia.
【24h】

Avoidable risk factors in perinatal deaths: A perinatal audit in South Australia.

机译:围产期死亡中可避免的危险因素:南澳大利亚的围产期审核。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objectives: To analyse risk factors of perinatal death, with an emphasis on potentially avoidable risk factors, and differences in the frequency of suboptimal care factors between maternity units with different levels of care. Methods: Six hundred and eight pregnancies (2001-2005) in South Australia resulting in perinatal death were described and compared to 86 623 live birth pregnancies. Results: Two hundred and seventy cases (44.4%) were found to have one or more avoidable maternal risk factors, 31 cases (5.1%) had a risk factor relating access to care, while 68 cases (11.2%) were associated with deficiencies in professional care. One hundred and four women (17.1% of cases) presented too late for timely medical care: 85% of these did have a sufficient number of antenatal visits. The following independent maternal risk factors for perinatal death were found: assisted reproductive technology (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.16), preterm labour (AOR 22.05), antepartum haemorrhage (APH) abruption (AOR 6.40),APH other/unknown cause (AOR 2.19), intrauterine growth restriction (AOR 3.94), cervical incompetence (AOR 8.89), threatened miscarriage (AOR 1.89), pre-existing hypertension (AOR 1.72), psychiatric disorder (AOR 1.85) and minimal antenatal care (AOR 2.89). The most commonly found professional care deficiency in cases was the failure to act on or recognise high-risk pregnancies/complications, found in 49 cases (8.1%). Conclusion: Further improvements in perinatal mortality may be achieved by greater emphasis on the importance of antenatal care and educating women to recognise signs and symptoms that require professional assessment. Education of maternity care providers may benefit from a further focus on how to recognise and/or manage high-risk pregnancies.
机译:目的:分析围产期死亡的危险因素,重点是潜在可避免的危险因素,以及不同护理水平的产妇单位之间次优护理因素发生频率的差异。方法:描述了南澳大利亚州的608例妊娠(2001-2005年)导致围产期死亡,并将其与86 623例活产妊娠进行了比较。结果:发现有170例(44.4%)具有可避免的孕产妇危险因素,有31例(5.1%)有与获得医疗服务有关的危险因素,而68例(11.2%)与母亲的缺乏有关。专业护理。一百零四名妇女(占病例的17.1%)出诊太晚而不能及时就医:其中有85%的妇女确实有足够的产前检查。发现以下围产期死亡的独立孕产妇危险因素:辅助生殖技术(调整后的优势比(AOR)3.16),早产(AOR 22.05),产前出血(APH)早产(AOR 6.40),APH其他/未知原因(AOR) 2.19),宫内生长受限(AOR 3.94),宫颈功能不全(AOR 8.89),先兆流产(AOR 1.89),既往高血压(AOR 1.72),精神病(AOR 1.85)和基本产前护理(AOR 2.89)。在病例中,最常见的专业护理缺陷是无法对高危妊娠/并发症采取行动或无法识别,有49例(8.1%)。结论:通过更加强调产前护理的重要性和教育妇女认识需要专业评估的体征和症状,可以进一步改善围产期死亡率。产妇保健提供者的教育可能会从进一步关注如何识别和/或管理高风险怀孕中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号