首页> 外文期刊>Australian journal of acupuncture and Chinese medicine. >Acupuncture Education Standards in Australia: A Critical Review
【24h】

Acupuncture Education Standards in Australia: A Critical Review

机译:澳大利亚的针灸教育标准:评论评述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The implementation of the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme for the Health Professions incorporates the registration of acupuncturists under the Chinese Medicine Board of Australia from 1 July 2012. Other registered health professionals will still be able to use the title acupuncturist if their board determines that they are suitably qualified to have their registration endorsed for acupuncture. This paper aims to identify the various education and training standards underpinning the practice of acupuncture among the health professions in Australia and create a reference point to determine the impact of registration on future acupuncture education standards. A literature search was conducted to identify scholarly works on acupuncture education standards as well as a search of standard setting bodies and course providers. Results were tabulated for comparison. There is very little literature on acupuncture education standards in Australia despite its practice by a diverse range of health professions. Acupuncture practitioners can be categorised into four groups: Chinese medicine practitioners, medical practitioners, registered allied health practitioners and non-registered health practitioners. The highest education standards are demonstrated by Chinese medicine practitioners who typically complete at least a four year undergraduate degree, whereas the latter two groups appear to favour two or three day continuing professional development courses despite the availability of post-graduate programs. The standards for medical practitioners are obscured by a non-transparent accreditation process. Restriction of title registration in Victoria has coincided with a trend for these short courses to be described as 'dry needling' rather than acupuncture, thus circumventing the education standards, regulatory processes and protection of public health and safety which underpins occupational regulation. National boards will need to collaborate and carefully consi...
机译:从2012年7月1日起,澳大利亚国家中医管理局将针灸师的注册纳入了《健康专业人士国家注册和认证计划》的实施。如果其他注册健康专家的董事会认为自己是针灸师,则仍可以使用针灸师的头衔。有资格获得其注册认可以进行针灸的资格。本文旨在确定在澳大利亚卫生专业人员中支持针灸实践的各种教育和培训标准,并为确定注册对未来针灸教育标准的影响提供参考。进行了文献检索,以鉴定有关针灸教育标准的学术著作以及标准制定机构和课程提供者。将结果制成表格以进行比较。尽管针灸教育标准是由多种医疗专业实践的,但在澳大利亚却很少。针灸从业者可分为四类:中医师,从业者,注册专职医疗人员和非注册医务人员。中医证明了最高的教育水平,他们通常完成了至少四年的本科学位,而尽管有研究生课程,后两组似乎更喜欢两到三天的持续专业发展课程。执业医师的标准被不透明的认证程序所掩盖。在维多利亚州,限制头衔注册的趋势与将这些短期课程描述为“干针刺”而不是针灸的趋势相吻合,从而规避了教育标准,监管程序以及对公共卫生和安全的保护,而这是职业监管的基础。国家委员会将需要合作并认真考虑...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号