...
首页> 外文期刊>Australasian Plant Pathology >Risks and benefits of soil amendment with composts in relation to plant pathogens.
【24h】

Risks and benefits of soil amendment with composts in relation to plant pathogens.

机译:与植物病原体相关的堆肥改良土壤的风险和收益。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The supply of composts has increased in many countries due to the enforced diversion from landfill of organic biodegradable wastes. Disposal is often the primary financial and environmental incentive for composting this organic waste, with benefits from low value end-products such as organic soil amendments being a secondary or negligible consideration. The use of composts can also pose risks from populations of plant and animal pathogens which may have survived the composting process. However, the suppressive effect of amending soils with composts on crop and turf grass diseases caused by soil-borne plant pathogens can be a significant benefit. The increasing environmental unacceptability and unavailability of effective chemical fungicide treatments has increased this potential value of composts. Information on the effects of compost amendment of soil or sand on diseases caused by soil-borne pathogens was reviewed. Out of 79 container experiments, where soil was generally amended with >=20% v/v compost, 59 showed a disease suppressive effect and only 6 showed a disease promoting effect of the compost amendment. Following amendment of soil in the field with compost, generally at >=15 t/ha, disease suppression occurred in 45 out of 59 experiments, and disease promotion in only one. Although abiotic factors such as increases in soil pH or release of volatiles following compost amendment explained control of some diseases, loss of suppressiveness following compost sterilisation frequently demonstrated a biological control mechanism such as microbial antagonism or induced plant resistance. Prediction of the disease suppressiveness of composts or compost amended soils from their microbial activity by measurement of the hydrolysis of fluorescein diacaetate, dehydrogenase activity, or basal respiration has been variable. Changes in microbial community structure detected using T-RFLP and DGGE analyses have been more reliable indicators of the disease suppressiveness of compost amended soils. Inoculation of composts with biological control agents is also a promising technique for improving the efficacy and reliability of disease suppression following soil amendment.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13313-010-0025-7
机译:由于强制将有机可降解废物从垃圾填埋场转移,许多国家堆肥的供应有所增加。处置通常是堆肥这种有机废物的主要财务和环境激励措施,次要的或可忽略的考虑因素是低价值最终产品(例如有机土壤改良剂)的收益。堆肥的使用还可能带来可能在堆肥过程中幸存下来的动植物病原体种群的风险。但是,用堆肥改良土壤对土壤传播的植物病原体引起的农作物和草皮草疾病的抑制作用可能会带来重大好处。有效化学杀真菌剂处理日益增加的环境不可接受性和不可用性增加了这种堆肥的潜在价值。综述了土壤或沙子堆肥改良对土壤传播病原体引起疾病的影响的信息。在79个容器实验中,通常用> = 20%v / v堆肥对土壤进行改良,其中59个显示出了抑制疾病的作用,只有6个显示出了堆肥改良剂的促进疾病的作用。在田间用堆肥改良土壤后,通常大于等于15吨/公顷,在59个实验中有45个抑制了疾病,而只有一个实验促进了疾病。尽管非生物因素(例如堆肥改良后土壤pH值的升高或挥发物的释放)解释了某些疾病的控制,但堆肥灭菌后抑制性的丧失常常证明了一种生物控制机制,例如微生物拮抗作用或诱导的植物抗性。通过测量二氟乙酸荧光素的水解,脱氢酶活性或基础呼吸来从堆肥或堆肥改良土壤的微生物活性预测其疾病抑制性是可变的。使用T-RFLP和DGGE分析检测到的微生物群落结构的变化已成为堆肥改良土壤对疾病抑制性的更可靠指标。用生物防治剂接种堆肥也是改善土壤改良后抑制疾病的功效和可靠性的一种有前途的技术。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13313-010-0025-7

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号