首页> 外文期刊>Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France >Comparing two methods for estimating floral resource availability for insect pollinators in semi-natural habitats
【24h】

Comparing two methods for estimating floral resource availability for insect pollinators in semi-natural habitats

机译:比较两种估算半自然生境中昆虫传粉者花卉资源可利用性的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pollinator and flowering plant interactions play a critical role in maintaining most terrestrial ecosystems, including agroecosystems. Although estimates of floral resource availability are essential to understand plant-pollinator relationships, no generally accepted methodology exists to date. We compared two methods for sampling floral resources in a single meadow. About every three days, we recorded species lists of insect-pollinated plants with abundance categories assigned to each species (hereafter referred to as scanning) and we counted the flowering shoots in 36 2x2m quadrats (hereafter quadrat sampling). These methods were compared with respect to (i) the number of species detected, (ii) estimated floral resource abundance, and (iii) temporal changes in flowering. With scanning, we found more potential nectar-plant species and species were found earlier than with quadrat sampling. With the latter, abundant species were found with higher probability than the scarce. Flower abundances were correlated between the two methods. We predicted that a cover of 6.33.6% should be used for an appropriate estimate of flower abundance in our study site, although the optimal cover probably varies across different habitats. Furthermore, flower abundance changed 6% per day compared to the flowering peak. Overall, scanning seems to be more appropriate for detecting presence and the timing of species, while quadrats may provide higher resolution for abundance estimates. Increased sampling coverage and frequency may enhance research accuracy and using scanning and quadrat sampling simultaneously may help to optimize research effort. We encourage further development of sampling protocols.
机译:传粉媒介与开花植物的相互作用在维持大多数陆地生态系统(包括农业生态系统)中起着至关重要的作用。尽管花卉资源可用性的估算对于了解植物与授粉媒介之间的关系至关重要,但迄今为止尚无公认的方法。我们比较了在单个草地上采样花卉资源的两种方法。大约每三天,我们记录一次昆虫授粉植物的物种清单,并为每个物种分配丰度类别(以下称为扫描),并计算了36个2x2m正方形(以下称为正方形采样)中的开花芽。将这些方法与(i)检测到的物种数量,(ii)估计的花卉资源丰富度和(iii)开花的时间变化进行了比较。通过扫描,我们发现了更多潜在的花蜜植物物种,并且比四方采样更早地发现了物种。对于后者,发现丰富物种的可能性高于稀缺物种。两种方法之间的花朵丰度相关。我们预测在我们的研究地点应该使用6.33.6%的覆盖率来适当估计花朵的丰度,尽管最佳覆盖率可能会因不同的生境而异。此外,与开花高峰相比,花朵的丰度每天变化6%。总体而言,扫描似乎更适合检测物种的存在和时间,而四方体可能为丰度估计提供更高的分辨率。增加的采样范围和频率可以提高研究准确性,同时使用扫描和正交采样可以帮助优化研究工作。我们鼓励进一步开发采样协议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号