首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Self-measured blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Self-measured blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:高血压管理中的自我测量血压监测:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Clinical guidelines recommend that adults with hypertension self-monitor their blood pressure (BP). Purpose: To summarize evidence about the effectiveness of selfmeasured blood pressure (SMBP) monitoring in adults with hypertension. Data Sources: MEDLINE (inception to 8 February 2013) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (fourth quarter 2012). Study Selection: 52 prospective comparative studies of SMBP monitoring with or without additional support versus usual care or an alternative SMBP monitoring intervention in persons with hypertension. Data Extraction: Data on population, interventions, BP, other outcomes, and study method were extracted. Random-effects model meta-analyses were done. Data Synthesis: For SMBP monitoring alone versus usual care (26 comparisons), moderate-strength evidence supports a lower BP with SMBP monitoring at 6 months (summary net difference, -3.9 mm Hg and-2.4 mm Hg for systolic BP and diastolic BP) but not at 12 months. For SMBP monitoring plus additional support versus usual care (25 comparisons), high-strength evidence supports a lower BP with use of SMBP monitoring, ranging from-3.4 to-8.9 mm Hg for systolic BP and from-1.9 to-4.4 mm Hg for diastolic BP, at 12 months in good-quality studies. For SMBP monitoring plus additional support versus SMBP monitoring alone or with less intense additional support (13 comparisons), low-strength evidence fails to support a difference. Across all comparisons, evidence for clinical outcomes is insufficient. For other surrogate or intermediate outcomes, low-strength evidence fails to show differences. Limitation: Clinical heterogeneity in protocols for SMBP monitoring, additional support, BP targets, and management; follow-up of 1 year or less in most studies, with sparse clinical outcome data. Conclusion: Self-measured BP monitoring with or without additional support lowers BP compared with usual care, but the BP effect beyond 12 months and long-term benefits remain uncertain. Additional support enhances the BP-lowering effect. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
机译:背景:临床指南建议患有高血压的成年人自我监测血压(BP)。目的:总结有关自我测量血压(SMBP)监测对成年人高血压的有效性的证据。数据来源:MEDLINE(从2013年2月8日开始)和Cochrane对照试验中央登记册和Cochrane系统评价数据库(2012年第四季度)。研究选择:52例有或没有额外支持的SMBP监测与常规护理或替代性SMBP监测干预对高血压患者的前瞻性比较研究。数据提取:提取有关人群,干预措施,血压,其他结局和研究方法的数据。进行了随机效应模型的荟萃分析。数据综合:对于单独进行SMBP监测与常规护理(26次比较),中等强度的证据支持在6个月时进行SMBP监测可降低血压(收缩压和舒张压的总净差,-3.9 mm Hg和-2.4 mm Hg)但不是在12个月时。对于SMBP监测,加上与常规护理相比的其他支持(25个比较),高强度证据支持使用SMBP监测降低血压,收缩压范围从-3.4到-8.9 mm Hg,而收缩压范围从-1.9到-4.4 mm Hg。舒张压,在12个月时进行的高质量研究。对于SMBP监测加上单独的支持与单独的SMBP监测相比,或者单独使用SMBP进行较少的额外支持(13个比较),低强度证据无法支持差异。在所有比较中,临床结果的证据不足。对于其他替代或中间结果,低强度证据未能显示出差异。局限性:SMBP监测,附加支持,BP目标和管理方案的临床异质性;大多数研究中随访时间为1年或更短,临床结果数据稀疏。结论:与常规治疗相比,有或没有额外支持的自测血压监测可降低血压,但超过12个月的血压影响和长期获益仍不确定。额外的支持可增强降低血压的作用。主要资金来源:卫生保健研究与质量局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号