首页> 外文期刊>Botany letters >Who eats who in biofilms? Exploring the drivers of microalgal and micromeiofaunal abundance
【24h】

Who eats who in biofilms? Exploring the drivers of microalgal and micromeiofaunal abundance

机译:谁在生物膜中吃谁?探索微藻和微动植物丰度的驱动因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A substantial amount of research has been dedicated to aquatic biofilms, but unlike the influence of macrograzers, that of microscopic herbivores (2 μm to 2 mm) has been largely disregarded. The selective pressure that they may exert remains unexplored, despite its potential impact on microbial community structure and ultimately, function. We performed in situ experiments to assess the abundance of microflora and micro-meiofauna in mature biofilms, in four rivers located in southwest France, stressing their quantitative importance (averaging 50% of the total number of organisms counted). We highlighted that the balance between microflora and micro-meiofauna depends on local environmental conditions, and specific taxon selection is likely to provide information on river pollution. Indeed, microalgae were directly favoured by nutrients and indirectly by biocides targeting micrograzers. In contrast, micro-meiofauna was predominant in sites where herbicides were found, in particular photosynthesis inhibitors (e.g. in the River Ponteils, 97% micro-meiofauna). Although the prey–predator relationships in the laboratory experiment appeared to depend on the initial pools of microorganisms during the first days, they reached stable states within a week. Then, all cultures stabilized around a ratio of 20 ± 6: 1 prey/potential predator. Further research is required to better understand the abiotic (water quality, habitat) and biotic (traits of the organisms present) drivers governing the coexistence of microalgae and their predators across the microbial landscape, and its consequences on the structure and function of the aquatic ecosystem.
机译:大量研究致力于水生生物膜,但是与大型放牧者的影响不同,微观草食动物(2μm至2 mm)的研究已被大大忽略。尽管它们可能对微生物群落结构及其最终功能产生潜在的影响,但他们仍可能会施加选择性压力。我们在法国西南部的四条河流中进行了原位实验,以评估成熟生物膜中微生物区系和微藻的数量,强调其定量重要性(平均占所计数生物总数的50%)。我们着重指出,微生物区系和微型meiofauna之间的平衡取决于当地环境条件,特定的分类群选择可能会提供有关河流污染的信息。确实,微藻直接受到养分的青睐,而间接杀微生物剂则是针对微放牧者的青睐。相反,在发现除草剂的地方,尤其是光合作用抑制剂(例如,在蓬泰尔斯河中,有97%的微型藻类),微型藻类主要存在。尽管实验室实验中的捕食者与捕食者之间的关系似乎取决于第一天微生物的初始库,但它们在一周内就达到了稳定状态。然后,所有培养物稳定在大约20±6:1的猎物/潜在捕食者比率。需要进一步研究,以更好地了解控制微生物在整个微生物景观中共存的微藻(水质,栖息地)和生物(存在的生物的特征)驱动因素及其对水生生态系统结构和功能的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号