...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques >Depolarization ratio of polar stratospheric clouds in coastal Antarctica: comparison analysis between ground-based Micro Pulse Lidar and space-borne CALIOP observations
【24h】

Depolarization ratio of polar stratospheric clouds in coastal Antarctica: comparison analysis between ground-based Micro Pulse Lidar and space-borne CALIOP observations

机译:南极沿海平流层极地云的去极化率:地面微脉冲激光雷达与星载CALIOP观测之间的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) play an important role in polar ozone depletion, since they are involved in diverse ozone destruction processes (chlorine activation, denitrification). The degree of that ozone reduction is depending on the type of PSCs, and hence on their occurrence. Therefore PSC characterization, mainly focused on PSC-type discrimination, is widely demanded. The backscattering (R) and volume linear depolarization (δ~V) ratios are the parameters usually used in lidar measurements for PSC detection and identification. In this work, an improved version of the standard NASA/Micro Pulse Lidar (MPL-4), which includes a built-in depolarization detection module, has been used for PSC observations above the coastal Antarctic Belgrano II station (Argentina, 77.9° S 34.6° W, 256 m a.s.l.) since 2009. Examination of the MPL-4 δ~V feature as a suitable index for PSC-type discrimination is based on the analysis of the two-channel data, i.e., the parallel (p-) and perpendicular (s-) polarized MPL signals. This study focuses on the comparison of coincident δ~V-profiles as obtained from ground-based MPL-4 measurements during three Antarctic winters with those reported from the space-borne lidar CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) aboard the CALIPSO (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation) satellite in the same period (83 simultaneous cases are analysed for 2009-2011 austral winter times). Three different approaches are considered for the comparison analysis between both lidar profile data sets in order to test the degree of agreement: the correlation coefficient (CC), as a measure of the relationship between both PSC vertical structures; the mean differences together with their root mean square (RMS) values found between data sets; and the percentage differences (BIAS), parameter also used in profiling comparisons between CALIOP and other ground-based lidar systems. All of them are examined as a function of the CALIPSO ground-track distance from the Belgrano II station. Results represent a relatively good agreement between both ground-based MPL-4 and space-borne CALIOP profiles of the volume linear depolarization ratio δ~V for PSC events, once the MPL-4 depolarization calibration parameters are applied. Discrepancies between CALIOP and MPL-4 profiles in vertical layering structure are enhanced from 20 km up, likely due to a decrease of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for both lidar systems at those altitudes. Regarding the results obtained from the mean and the percentage differences found between MPL-4 and CALIOP δ~V profiles, a predominance of negative values is also observed, indicating a generalized underestimation of the MPL-4 depolarization as compared to that reported by CALIOP. However, absolute differences between those δ~V-profile data sets are no higher than a 10±11 % in average. Moreover, the degree of agreement between both lidar δ~V data sets is slightly dependent on the CALIPSO ground-track overpass distance from the Belgrano II station. That is, small discrepancies are found when CALIPSO ground-track distance is as close as far from the ground-based station. These results would indicate that MPL-4 depolarization observations would reflect relatively well the PSC field that CALIOP can detect at relatively large distances from the ground-based station. As a consequence, PSC properties can be statistically similar, on average, over large volumes, and hence the present weak disagreement found between both the lidar δ~V data sets can be likely dominated by small spatial PSC inhomogeneities along the CALIPSO separation from the station. This statement is based on the fact that Belgrano II is a station located well inside the stable Antarctic polar vortex, allowing determined thermodynamic conditions leading to a very low variability in the PSC field, and in their properties.
机译:极地平流层云(PSC)在极地臭氧消耗中起着重要作用,因为它们参与了各种臭氧破坏过程(氯活化,反硝化)。臭氧还原的程度取决于PSC的类型,并因此取决于它们的出现。因此,广泛要求以PSC类型的歧视为主要特征的PSC表征。背向散射(R)和体积线性去极化(δ〜V)之比是激光雷达测量中通常用于PSC检测和识别的参数。在这项工作中,已使用标准NASA /微脉冲激光雷达(MPL-4)的改进版本,其中包括内置的去极化检测模块,用于沿海南极Belgrano II站(阿根廷,南纬77.9°)的PSC观测。自2009年以来为34.6°W,256 m asl)。对MPL-4δ〜V特征作为PSC类型判别的合适指标的检验基于对两个通道数据的分析,即平行(p-)和垂直(s-)极化的MPL信号。这项研究的重点是比较三个南极冬季从地面MPL-4测得的重合δ〜V剖面与CALIPSO上的星载激光雷达CALIOP(正交偏振云气溶胶激光雷达)报告的相近δ〜V剖面(同期的“云气激光雷达和红外探路者卫星观测”卫星(分析了2009-2011年南方冬季的83例同时病例)。为了测试一致性程度,考虑了三种不同的方法用于两个激光雷达轮廓数据集之间的比较分析:相关系数(CC),用于衡量两个PSC垂直结构之间的关系;数据集之间的均值差及其均方根(RMS)值;百分比差异(BIAS)这个参数也用于CALIOP与其他地面激光雷达系统之间的性能比较。根据CALIPSO与Belgrano II站之间的地面轨道距离,对所有这些参数进行了检查。一旦应用了MPL-4去极化校准参数,结果就代表了地面MPL-4和PSC事件的体积线性去极化比δ〜V的星载CALIOP曲线之间的相对较好的一致性。垂直分层结构中的CALIOP和MPL-4轮廓之间的差异从20 km起增加,这可能是由于两个激光雷达系统在这些高度处的信噪比(SNR)降低所致。关于从MPL-4和CALIOPδ〜V曲线之间的平均值和百分比差异获得的结果,也观察到负值占主导地位,这表明与CALIOP报道的相比,MPL-4去极化的普遍低估。但是,这些δ〜V剖面数据集之间的绝对差平均不高于10±11%。此外,两个激光雷达δ〜V数据集之间的一致性程度略微取决于距Belgrano II站的CALIPSO地面轨道立交桥距离。也就是说,当CALIPSO地面轨道距离与地面站的距离尽可能近时,会发现很小的差异。这些结果表明,MPL-4的去极化观测将相对较好地反映CALIOP可以在距地面站相对较大的距离处检测到的PSC场。结果,在大体积上,PSC属性平均而言在统计上可以相似,因此,在两个激光雷达δ〜V数据集之间发现的当前弱分歧很可能由沿着CALIPSO距离站的较小的空间PSC不均匀性所支配。该陈述基于这样的事实,即Belgrano II是一个位于稳定南极极涡内部的站点,可以确定热力学条件,从而导致PSC场及其特性的变化非常小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号