...
首页> 外文期刊>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques >Comparison of two closed-path cavity-based spectrometers for measuring air-water CO2 and CH4 fluxes by eddy covariance
【24h】

Comparison of two closed-path cavity-based spectrometers for measuring air-water CO2 and CH4 fluxes by eddy covariance

机译:两种基于涡流协方差的基于封闭腔的光谱仪用于测量空气中的CO2和CH4通量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years several commercialised closedpath cavity-based spectroscopic instruments designed for eddy covariance flux measurements of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and water vapour (H2O) have become available. Here we compare the performance of two leading models - the Picarro G2311-f and the Los Gatos Research (LGR) Fast Greenhouse Gas Analyzer (FGGA) at a coastal site. Both instruments can compute dry mixing ratios of CO2 and CH4 based on concurrently measured H2O, temperature, and pressure. Additionally, we used a high throughput Nafion dryer to physically remove H2O from the Picarro airstream. Observed air-sea CO2 and CH4 fluxes from these two analysers, averaging about 12 and 0.12 mmol m(-2) day 1 respectively, agree within the measurement uncertainties. For the purpose of quantifying dry CO2 and CH4 fluxes downstream of a long inlet, the numerical H2O corrections appear to be reasonably effective and lead to results that are comparable to physical removal of H2O with a Nafion dryer in the mean. We estimate the high-frequency attenuation of fluxes in our closed-path set-up, which was relatively small (<= 10 %) for CO2 and CH4 but very large for the more polar H2O. The Picarro showed significantly lower noise and flux detection limits than the LGR. The hourly flux detection limit for the Picarro was about 2 mmol m(-2) day(-1) for CO2 and 0.02 mmol m(-2) day(-1) for CH4. For the LGR these detection limits were about 8 and 0.05 mmol m(-2) day(-1). Using global maps of monthly mean air-sea CO2 flux as reference, we estimate that the Picarro and LGR can resolve hourly CO2 fluxes from roughly 40 and 4% of the world's oceans respectively. Averaging over longer timescales would be required in regions with smaller fluxes. Hourly flux detection limits of CH4 from both instruments are generally higher than the expected emissions from the open ocean, though the signal to noise of this measurement may improve closer to the coast.
机译:近年来,已经有几种商业化的基于闭合路径腔的光谱仪器,这些仪器设计用于对二氧化碳(CO2),甲烷(CH4)和水蒸气(H2O)进行涡度协方差通量测量。在这里,我们比较了沿海地区Picarro G2311-f和Los Gatos Research(LGR)快速温室气体分析仪(FGGA)两种领先型号的性能。两种仪器都可以根据同时测量的H2O,温度和压力来计算CO2和CH4的干混比。此外,我们使用了高吞吐量的Nafion干燥机,从Picarro气流中物理去除了H2O。从这两个分析仪观察到的空气-海洋CO2和CH4通量分别在第1天平均分别约为12和0.12 mmol m(-2),在测量不确定度内是一致的。为了量化长进气口下游的干式CO2和CH4通量,数字化的H2O校正似乎是相当有效的,其结果与使用Nafion干燥机进行物理去除H2O相当。我们估计了封闭路径设置中通量的高频衰减,对于CO2和CH4来说,通量的高频衰减相对较小(<= 10%),而对于极性更大的H2O,通量的高频衰减较大。 Picarro的噪声和通量检测极限明显低于LGR。 Picarro的每小时通量检测极限对于CO2约为2 mmol m(-2)day(-1),对于CH4约为0.02 mmol m(-2)day(-1)。对于LGR,这些检测限分别为8和0.05 mmol m(-2)天(-1)。通过使用全球月平均海海CO2通量的全球地图作为参考,我们估计Picarro和LGR可以分别解析约40%和4%的世界海洋的每小时CO2通量。在通量较小的区域,将需要在更长的时间范围内进行平均。尽管测量的信噪比可能会在靠近海岸的地方有所改善,但两种仪器的CH4的每小时通量检测极限通常都高于公海的预期排放量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号