首页> 外文期刊>Brain injury: BI >Measuring apathy after traumatic brain injury: Psychometric properties of the Apathy Evaluation Scale and the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale.
【24h】

Measuring apathy after traumatic brain injury: Psychometric properties of the Apathy Evaluation Scale and the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale.

机译:颅脑外伤后测量冷漠:冷漠评估量表和额叶系统行为量表的心理测量特性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) and Apathy sub-scale of the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe-A) for people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). To identify an optimal cut-off score indicating presence of apathy according to the AES. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A sample of 34 participants with severe TBI currently residing in the community underwent neuropsychological and psychosocial assessment to evaluate reliability, discriminant, convergent and divergent validity. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was undertaken to identify an optimal cut-off score on the AES. RESULTS: AES and FrSBe-A correlated moderately with each other (r = 0.71). Both AES and FrSBe-A have good internal consistency and discriminant validity with measures of depression and fatigue. Support for hypothesized correlations with similar and dissimilar constructs was not shown. ROC analysis identified a cut-off score of 37 or higher on AES indicated presence of apathy. CONCLUSIONS: AES and FrSBe-A are reliable and valid measures of apathy following TBI. It is suggested that the two scales measure slightly differing aspects of the apathy construct, with AES addressing emotional-affective aspects of apathy more than FrSBe-A, which focuses more heavily on cognitive and behavioral elements of goal-directed behavior.
机译:目的:评估无意识评估量表(AES)和额叶系统行为量表(FrSBe-A)的无意识子量表对颅脑损伤患者的信度和效度。根据AES识别指示冷漠存在的最佳截止分数。方法和程序:对目前居住在社区的34名重度TBI参与者进行了神经心理和社会心理评估,以评估其信度,判别力,趋同性和分歧性。进行接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线分析以识别AES上的最佳截止分数。结果:AES和FrSBe-A之间存在适度的相关性(r = 0.71)。 AES和FrSBe-A都具有良好的内部一致性和判别效度,可测量抑郁和疲劳程度。没有显示对相似和不相似结构的假设相关性的支持。 ROC分析确定AES的临界分数为37或更高,表明存在冷漠。结论:AES和FrSBe-A是TBI后冷漠的可靠和有效措施。建议使用两个量表来衡量冷漠构造的一些细微不同方面,与AES相比,FrSBe-A处理冷漠的情感情感方面要更多,而FrSBe-A更侧重于目标导向行为的认知和行为要素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号