首页> 外文期刊>Asian Economic Journal >Optimal Structure of Technology Adoption and Creation: Basic versus Development Research in Relation to the Distance from the Technological Frontier
【24h】

Optimal Structure of Technology Adoption and Creation: Basic versus Development Research in Relation to the Distance from the Technological Frontier

机译:技术采用和创造的最佳结构:与技术前沿距离有关的基础与发展研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many economists maintain that in order to advance economic growth Asian countries should focus more on basic research than on technology adoption, and more on the supply of skilled workers than the supply of unskilled workers. In this context, this paper presents a theoretical model and empirical evidence to explain the observation that a country in which the level of technology approaches the technology frontier tends to rely more on technology creation than adoption, and invest more in basic research than in development. The model shows that technology creation involves both basic and development research processes, whereas technology adoption uses only the latter process. Therefore, R&D investment in our model involves three different processes: basic research in technology creation, development in technology creation, and development in technology adoption. The results suggest first that the rate of growth is positively correlated with the level of basic research activities in the technology creation sector, if a country's technology gap with the technology frontier is small enough. Second, an increase in the efficiency of the education system for highly skilled workers raises the level of basic research and the rate of growth. Third, verifying these theoretical results, empirical analyses using panel data from Korea, Japan and Taipei, China show that the narrower the distance to the technological frontier, the higher the growth effect of basic R&D, which indicates that the share of basic R&D matters for economic growth. Finally, the results also show that the quality of tertiary education has a significantly positive effect on the productivity of R&D.
机译:许多经济学家认为,为了促进经济增长,亚洲国家应更多地侧重于基础研究,而不是技术采用,更侧重于熟练工人的供给而不是非熟练工人的供给。在这种情况下,本文提供了一个理论模型和经验证据来解释以下观察:技术水平接近技术前沿的国家倾向于更多地依靠技术创造而不是采用技术,并且对基础研究的投入多于对发展的投入。该模型表明,技术创造涉及基础研究和开发研究过程,而技术采用仅使用后者。因此,我们模型中的R&D投资涉及三个不同的过程:技术创造的基础研究,技术创造的发展以及技术采用的发展。结果首先表明,如果一个国家与技术前沿的技术差距足够小,则增长率与技术创造部门的基础研究活动水平呈正相关。第二,高技能工人教育系统效率的提高提高了基础研究水平和增长率。第三,验证这些理论结果,使用来自中国韩国,日本和中国台北的面板数据进行的经验分析表明,与技术前沿的距离越窄,基础研发的增长效果就越高,这表明基础研发的份额对经济增长。最后,结果还表明,高等教育质量对研发生产率具有显着的积极影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号