首页> 外文期刊>American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal >The use of composite dust wipe samples as a means of assessing lead exposure.
【24h】

The use of composite dust wipe samples as a means of assessing lead exposure.

机译:使用复合除尘样品作为评估铅暴露的一种方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigated two methods for analyzing composite dust wipes for lead. The term composite means two or more wipes collected from common components in a dwelling that are combined in the field and analyzed as a single sample. Two methods--a modified Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 3050A and a Wisconsin Occupational Health Laboratory (WOHL) method--were selected based on their anticipated ability to handle the added mass of materials and dust expected in a composite. The study used off-the-shelf wipes to prepare single-, two-, and four-wipe samples. Wipes were spiked with a standard reference material at either a low dust loading level or a high level, and three laboratories analyzed the samples using both methods and both flame atomic absorption spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry techniques (ICP). Good agreement with known spiked levels was possible using either method; the modified EPA 3050A showed particular promise. When up to four wipes were combined, all three laboratories found that modified EPA Method 3050A resulted in recoveries between 89 and 101% of the known standard. Although it was possible to achieve good agreement with spiked levels using the WOHL method, some difficulties were encountered, particularly when followed by ICP analysis and when using four wipes. The increased time required to digest the multiwipe composites was not proportional to the number of wipes in a composite: the two- and four-wipe composites did not take two to four times as long as a single-wipe sample. Laboratory analysis of a four-wipe sample cost an average of 65% less than analysis of four single-wipe samples for each method.
机译:这项研究调查了两种分析复合粉尘铅的方法。术语“复合材料”是指从住宅中的常见组件收集的两个或多个擦拭巾,这些擦拭巾在现场进行组合并作为单个样本进行分析。根据两种材料的预期处理复合材料和粉尘质量的预期能力,选择了两种方法-改良的环境保护局(EPA)方法3050A和​​威斯康星州职业健康实验室(WOHL)方法。该研究使用现成的擦拭巾来制备单擦拭,两擦拭和四擦拭的样品。用低尘含量或高尘含量的标准参比材料加湿巾,三个实验室使用这两种方法以及火焰原子吸收光谱法和电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱法(ICP)来分析样品。使用任何一种方法都可以与已知的加标水平达成良好的一致性。修改后的EPA 3050A具有特别的前景。当最多组合四个擦拭巾时,所有三个实验室都发现,改良的EPA方法3050A的回收率是已知标准品的89%至101%。尽管使用WOHL方法可以实现与加标浓度的良好一致性,但是仍然遇到了一些困难,尤其是在进行ICP分析之后以及使用四个擦拭布时。消化多次擦拭复合物所需的增加时间与复合物中擦拭物的数量不成比例:两次擦拭和四次擦拭的复合物所需的时间不是单次擦拭样品的两倍至四倍。每种方法的四个擦拭样品的实验室分析成本平均比四个单个擦拭样品的分析成本低65%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号