首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bonepatellar tendonbone graft: Comparison of autograft, fresh-frozen allograft, and γ-irradiated allograft
【24h】

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bonepatellar tendonbone graft: Comparison of autograft, fresh-frozen allograft, and γ-irradiated allograft

机译:pat骨肌腱移植重建前交叉韧带:自体移植,新鲜冷冻同种异体移植和γ射线同种异体移植的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare clinical follow-up results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using (1) autologous, (2) fresh-frozen allogeneic, and (3) γ-irradiated allogeneic bonepatellar tendonbone (BPTB). Methods: From February 2002 to January 2006, 187 patients received BPTB ACL reconstruction at our center. One hundred forty-two consecutive patients who had received single-bundle BPTB ACL reconstruction were included in this study. Of these patients, 41 had autografts, 33 had fresh-frozen allografts, and 68 had γ-irradiated allografts. Clinical results were evaluated with the KT-1000 maximum displacement test (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), Lachman test, and Lysholm, Irrgang, and Larson activity scales. Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 6.7 ± 1.5 years (range, 4.2 to 8.2 years). There were 3 cases of acute synovitis due to immunologic rejection (fresh-frozen allografts) and 6 cases of failure (γ-irradiated allografts). KT-1000 examination showed more anterior laxity in the γ-irradiated allograft group compared with the autograft and fresh-frozen allograft groups (P <.05). The Lysholm, Irrgang, and Larson activity scales showed no difference among the 3 groups (P >.05). Conclusions: The study showed a statistically poorer KT-1000 result and higher failure rate in the γ-irradiated allograft group compared with the autograft and fresh-frozen allograft groups. This may suggest that γ-irradiated allograft is not a good candidate graft for ACL reconstruction. Power analysis showed that the study was underpowered, so further research and longer follow-up study are needed to make this point clearer. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
机译:目的:比较使用(1)自体,(2)新鲜冷冻的同种异体和(3)γ射线照射的同种异体骨pat腱(BPTB)重建前交叉韧带(ACL)的临床随访结果。方法:从2002年2月至2006年1月,我们中心对187例BPTB ACL进行了重建。这项研究包括了连续接受单束BPTB ACL重建的42例患者。在这些患者中,有41例自体移植,33例为新鲜冷冻同种异体移植,68例接受γ射线照射的同种异体移植。使用KT-1000最大位移测试(MEDmetric,加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥),Lachman测试以及Lysholm,Irrgang和Larson活动量表对临床结果进行评估。结果:平均随访时间为6.7±1.5年(范围4.2至8.2年)。有3例因免疫排斥反应引起的急性滑膜炎(新鲜冷冻同种异体移植)和6例衰竭(γ射线照射的同种异体移植)。与同种异体移植组和新鲜冷冻同种异体移植组相比,经KT-1000检查的患者在γ射线同种异体移植组中前松弛度更高(P <.05)。 Lysholm,Irrgang和Larson的活动量表显示3组之间无差异(P> .05)。结论:该研究表明,与同种异体移植和新鲜冷冻同种异体移植组相比,经γ射线照射的同种异体移植组的KT-1000结果在统计学上较差,失败率更高。这可能表明,经γ射线照射的同种异体移植物不是用于ACL重建的良好候选移植物。功效分析表明该研究动力不足,因此需要进一步研究和更长的随访研究以使这一点更清楚。证据级别:III级,回顾性比较研究。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号