...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >The diagnostic value of clinical tests, magnetic resonance imaging, and instrumented laxity in the differentiation of complete versus partial anterior cruciate ligament tears
【24h】

The diagnostic value of clinical tests, magnetic resonance imaging, and instrumented laxity in the differentiation of complete versus partial anterior cruciate ligament tears

机译:临床检查,磁共振成像和仪器检查松弛对前交叉韧带完全或部分撕裂的诊断价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate the question of whether different arthroscopically confirmed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury patterns have distinctive preoperative findings on clinical examination, instrumented laxity, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: Three hundred consecutive ACL-deficient patients with isolated ACL tears were evaluated with the Lachman test (LT), the pivot-shift test (PST), stress radiographs using the Telos Stress Device (Metax, Hungen, Germany), and MRI. After arthroscopic confirmation of the ACL injury, we grouped patients into 4 different ACL tear types (complete, partial anteromedial [AM] bundle intact, posterolateral [PL] bundle intact, and posterior cruciate ligament [PCL] healing), and partial tears were further evaluated for mechanical integrity and functionality of the remaining fibers. Results: PST grades of +2 and +3 were consistent with complete ACL tears (86%; P <.00001), whereas PST grades of 0 or +1 were strongly related to partial tears (76%; P <.00001). Instrumented laxity results showed a significant difference in side-to-side difference (SSD) of anterior tibial translation in complete tears (9.1 ± 3.4 mm) versus partial tears (5.2 ± 2.9 mm; P <.0001). Most PL-intact cases were "functional" (67%), with lower instrumented laxity values (SSD, 4.3 ± 2.3 mm) than the "nonfunctional" cases (SSD, 6.7 ± 2.9 mm; P <.001). The contrary was not observed for AM-intact cases (17% functional). Partial ACL tears with functional remaining fibers had PST grades of 0 or +1 and less than a 4 mm SSD in stress radiographs (sensitivity, 0.76; specificity, 0.90). Partial ACL tears with nonfunctional fibers had positive PST results and an SSD of anterior tibial displacement from 4 to 9 mm (sensitivity, 0.56; specificity, 0.92). Positive PST results and an SSD greater than 9 mm was recorded in complete ACL tears (sensitivity, 0.88; specificity, 0.96). MRI analysis revealed overlapping results between complete and partial tears. Conclusions: Preoperative evaluation of different ACL tear types showed differences between complete and partial ACL tears with functional fibers in clinical examination and instrumented laxity tests. The combination of clinical tests and stress radiographs produced threshold values that distinguished complete from partial ACL tears, which may help the surgeon in the early identification of the presence of remaining functional fibers. Level of Evidence: Level III, case-control study.
机译:目的:评估在临床检查,仪器松弛和磁共振成像(MRI)上不同的经关节镜检查证实的前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤类型是否具有独特的术前发现的问题。方法:采用Lachman检验(LT),枢轴位移检验(PST),使用Telos应力装置(Metax,Hungen,德国)和MRI进行X线照相,对300例连续的ACL缺陷患者进行了单独的ACL撕裂评估。在关节镜下确认ACL损伤后,我们将患者分为4种不同的ACL撕裂类型(完整,部分前内侧[AM]束完整,后外侧[PL]束完整和后交叉韧带[PCL]愈合),并进一步分离部分泪液评估剩余纤维的机械完整性和功能性。结果:PST等级为+2和+3与完全ACL撕裂一致(86%; P <.00001),而PST等级0或+1与部分撕裂强烈相关(76%; P <.00001)。仪器检测的松弛度结果显示,完全撕裂(9.1±3.4 mm)与部分撕裂(5.2±2.9 mm; P <.0001)相比,胫骨前平移的左右差异(SSD)显着。大多数PL完整病例为“功能性”病例(67%),其仪器测量的松弛度值(SSD为4.3±2.3毫米)低于“非功能性”病例(SSD为6.7±2.9毫米; P <.001)。对于AM完整病例(功能性17%)未观察到相反的情况。在压力射线照相中,具有功能性剩余纤维的部分ACL泪液的PST等级为0或+1,且SSD小于4 mm SSD(敏感性0.76;特异性0.90)。带有非功能性纤维的部分ACL泪液的PST结果为阳性,且胫骨前移位为4至9 mm的SSD(敏感性为0.56;特异性为0.92)。在完整的ACL撕裂中记录了PST阳性结果和大于9 mm的SSD(灵敏度为0.88;特异性为0.96)。 MRI分析显示完全和部分泪液重叠。结论:对不同类型的ACL泪液进行术前评估表明,在临床检查和仪器松弛试验中,功能纤维完全和部分ACL泪液之间存在差异。临床测试和应力X射线照片相结合产生的阈值与完全ACL撕裂完全不同,这可能有助于外科医生及早发现残留的功能性纤维。证据级别:III级,病例对照研究。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号