...
【24h】

A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus.

机译:FasT-Fix半月板修复缝合线系统与尸体半月板中Rapid Rapid装置的生物力学比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

PURPOSE: This biomechanical study compared the fixation characteristics of horizontally or vertically implanted FasT-Fix devices (Smith & Nephew, Endoscopy Division, Andover, MA) consisting of two 5-mm PLLA suture T-bar anchors with a pretied self-sliding knot (No. 0 nonabsorbable, USP, braided polyester suture material) and the RapidLoc device (Mitek Surgical Products, Westwood, MA) consisting of a PLLA T-bar anchor or "backstop," a connecting suture (No. 2 nonbiodegradable Ethibond; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ), and a PLLA grommet, for repairing posterior third lesions in human menisci. TYPE OF STUDY: Controlled laboratory biomechanical study. METHODS: After repair of a vertical longitudinal meniscus lesion with either vertically or horizontally implanted FasT-Fix devices or RapidLoc devices, 3 groups of 6 specimens underwent cyclic loading (5 mm/minute, cycling between 5 and 50 N at 1 Hz for 500 cycles) before load to failure testing on a servo hydraulic device. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD post hoc tests were used to evaluate group differences (P < .05). RESULTS: The vertical FasT-Fix device group (3.2 +/- 0.49 mm) had less displacement after cyclic testing than either the horizontal FasT-Fix (4.4 +/- 0.73 mm, P = .003) or the RapidLoc (4.6 +/- 0.22 mm, P = .002) device groups. The vertical FasT-Fix device group had greater stiffness during cyclic testing (14.4 +/- 2.1 N/mm) than the horizontal FasT-Fix (10.4 +/- 1.6 N/mm, P = .0001) or the RapidLoc (9.7 +/- 0.44 N/mm, P = .0001) device groups. During load to failure testing, the vertical FasT-Fix group (125.3 +/- 39 N) had 28% greater strength than the horizontal FasT-Fix device group (89.7 +/- 14 N, P = .02) and 30% greater strength than the RapidLoc device group (87.1 +/- 13 N, P = .028), whereas displacement and stiffness did not show statistically significant group differences. CONCLUSIONS: The vertical FasT-Fix group had superior biomechanical characteristics for meniscal fixation during cyclic and load to failure testing compared with horizontal FasT-Fix or RapidLoc devices. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although the RapidLoc devices provided fixation characteristics comparable to horizontally implanted FasT-Fix devices, vertically implanted FasT-Fix devices may provide superior all-inside fixation.
机译:目的:这项生物力学研究比较了水平或垂直植入的FasT-Fix装置(Smith&Nephew,内窥镜部门,马萨诸塞州安多弗)的固定特性,该装置由两个5毫米PLLA缝合T型杆锚定件和一个自滑动结( 0号不可吸收的USP编织聚酯缝合线材料)和RapidLoc装置(美国马萨诸塞州韦斯特伍德的Mitek外科产品公司),由PLLA T型锚或“支撑”组成,连接缝合线(2号不可生物降解的Ethibond; Ethicon,新泽西州萨默维尔市(Somerville,NJ)和PLLA索环,用于修复人类半月板的后部第三个病变。研究类型:受控实验室生物力学研究。方法:用垂直或水平植入的FasT-Fix装置或RapidLoc装置修复垂直纵向半月板病变后,对3组6个样本进行循环加载(5毫米/分钟,以1 Hz的频率在5至50 N之间循环500次) )在伺服液压设备上进行负载失效测试之前。方差和Tukey HSD事后检验的单向分析用于评估组差异(P <.05)。结果:周期性测试后,垂直FasT-Fix设备组(3.2 +/- 0.49 mm)的位移少于水平FasT-Fix(4.4 +/- 0.73 mm,P = .003)或RapidLoc(4.6 + / -0.22 mm,P = .002)设备组。垂直FasT-Fix设备组在循环测试(14.4 +/- 2.1 N / mm)时比水平FasT-Fix(10.4 +/- 1.6 N / mm,P = .0001)或RapidLoc(9.7 + /-0.44 N / mm,P = .0001)设备组。在负载失效测试期间,垂直FasT-Fix组(125.3 +/- 39 N)的强度比水平FasT-Fix设备组(89.7 +/- 14 N,P = .02)高28%强度高于RapidLoc设备组(87.1 +/- 13 N,P = .028),而位移和刚度并未显示出统计学上显着的组差异。结论:与水平FasT-Fix或RapidLoc设备相比,垂直FasT-Fix组在循环和负荷至破坏测试期间具有优异的生物力学特性,可用于半月板固定。临床相关性:尽管RapidLoc设备提供的固定特性可与水平植入的FasT-Fix设备媲美,但垂直植入的FasT-Fix设备可提供出色的全内固定。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号