...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Initial fixation strength of massive rotator cuff tears: in vitro comparison of single-row suture anchor and transosseous tunnel constructs.
【24h】

Initial fixation strength of massive rotator cuff tears: in vitro comparison of single-row suture anchor and transosseous tunnel constructs.

机译:大型肩袖撕裂的初始固定强度:单排缝合锚钉和穿骨隧道构造的体外比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro repair integrity of massive rotator cuff tears fixed with transosseous tunnel and single-lateral row suture anchor techniques. METHODS: A 5 x 2-cm crescent-shaped rotator cuff tear was created in 6 matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders. Paired shoulders were repaired with 3 transosseous tunnels and 6 Mason-Allen sutures or with 3 screw-in suture anchors and 6 simple sutures. The repairs were cyclically loaded at physiologic forces along the respective directions of pull when the arm was in 90 degrees of scapular plane elevation. Gap formation and repair displacements were monitored with digital video imaging at 3 sites for each repair. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the maximal gapping of the repair constructs. After 4,000 cycles, the mean maximal gapping at any position along the repair was 6.2 +/- 2.99 mm in the transosseous tunnel construct and 4.9 +/- 1.27 mm in the suture anchor repair construct (P = .40). Gapping was significantly less in the anterior region when compared with the posterior region of the repair (P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in cyclic loading of transosseous and single-row suture anchor repair techniques. Significantly greater gap formation occurs at the posterior aspect of repairs of massive rotator cuff tears in this in vitro model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Initial fixation strength of single-row suture anchor repairs is equivalent to that of transosseous repairs. Further research is required to determine the unknown clinical significance of increased posterior repair gap formation.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较采用骨穿隧和单侧行缝合锚固技术固定的大型肩袖撕裂的体外修复完整性。方法:在6对匹配的尸体肩膀上创建5 x 2 cm新月形的肩袖撕裂。配对的肩部用3根穿骨隧道和6根Mason-Allen缝合线或3颗旋入式缝合锚钉和6根简单缝合线进行修复。当手臂处于肩cap骨平面仰角90度时,沿各自的拉动方向以生理力周期性地进行修复。每次修复在3个位置用数字视频成像监测间隙形成和修复位移。结果:修复结构的最大缺口之间没有显着差异。在4,000个周期后,沿骨修复的任何位置的平均最大间隙在穿骨隧道构造中为6.2 +/- 2.99 mm,在缝合锚钉修复构造中为4.9 +/- 1.27 mm(P = .40)。与修复的后部区域相比,前部区域的间隙明显更少(P = .015)。结论:骨和单行缝合锚钉修复技术的循环载荷没有差异。在此体外模型中,大的肩袖撕裂修复的后方发生了更大的间隙形成。临床相关性:单排缝合锚钉修复的初始固定强度与经骨骨修复的强度相同。需要进一步的研究以确定增加后修复间隙形成的未知临床意义。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号