...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis and Rheumatism >Defining appropriate outcome measures in pulmonary arterial hypertension related to systemic sclerosis: a Delphi consensus study with cluster analysis.
【24h】

Defining appropriate outcome measures in pulmonary arterial hypertension related to systemic sclerosis: a Delphi consensus study with cluster analysis.

机译:定义与系统性硬化症相关的肺动脉高压的适当结果指标:一项采用聚类分析的Delphi共识研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Outcome measures for pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with systemic sclerosis (PAH-SSc) are only partially validated. The aim of the present study was to establish an expert consensus regarding which outcome measures are most appropriate for clinical trials in PAH-SSc. METHODS: Sixty-nine PAH-SSc experts (rheumatologists, cardiologists, pulmonologists) rated a list of disease domains and measurement tools in an Internet-based 3-stage Delphi consensus study. In stages 2 and 3, the medians of domains and measurement tools and frequency distributions of ratings, along with requests for re-ratings, were distributed to respondents to provide feedback. A final score of items was identified by means of cluster analysis. RESULTS: The experts judged the following domains and tools as most appropriate for randomized controlled trials in PAH-SSc: lung vascular/pulmonary arterial pressure and cardiac function both measured by right heart catheterization and echocardiography, exercise testing measured by 6-minute walking test and oxygen saturation at exercise, severity of dyspnea measured on a visual analog scale, discontinuation of treatment measured by (serious) adverse events, quality of life/activities of daily living measured by the Short Form 36 and Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index, and global state assessed by physician measured by survival. CONCLUSION: Among experts in PAH-SSc, a core set of outcome measures has been defined for clinical trials by Delphi consensus methods. Although these outcome measures are recommended by this expert group to be used as an interim tool, it will be necessary to formally validate the present measures, as well as potential research measures, in further studies.
机译:目的:与系统性硬化症相关的肺动脉高压(PAH-SSc)的治疗措施仅得到部分验证。本研究的目的是就哪种结局指标最适合PAH-SSc的临床试验建立专家共识。方法:69位PAH-SSc专家(风湿病学家,心脏病学家,肺病学家)在基于Internet的3阶段Delphi共识研究中对疾病域列表和测量工具进行了评级。在第2阶段和第3阶段,将域和测量工具的中位数以及评级的频率分布以及重新评级的请求分发给受访者以提供反馈。通过聚类分析确定项目的最终得分。结果:专家们认为以下领域和工具最适合用于PAH-SSc的随机对照试验:右心导管和超声心动图测量肺血管/肺动脉压和心功能,6分钟步行测试测量运动测试,运动时的血氧饱和度,以视觉模拟量表测得的呼吸困难的严重程度,通过(严重)不良事件测得的治疗中止,通过简表36和健康评估问卷残疾指数测得的生活质量/日常生活活动量以及总体状态由医师评估生存率。结论:在PAH-SSc的专家中,已经通过Delphi共识方法为临床试验定义了一套核心的结果指标。尽管此专家组建议将这些结果度量用作临时工具,但有必要在进一步研究中正式验证当前的度量以及潜在的研究度量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号