首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis and Rheumatism >Low- Versus High-Dose Rituximab for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Low- Versus High-Dose Rituximab for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:类风湿关节炎的低剂量大剂量利妥昔单抗:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. The approved dose of rituximab (RTX) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is 2 x 1,000 mg infusions given 2 weeks apart. There is contradictory evidence regarding the effectiveness of a lower-dose regimen (2 x 500 mg) of RTX. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of low- and high-dose RTX and to test the noninferiority of the low-dose regimen. Methods. A systematic literature review searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing low- and high-dose RTX for RA was conducted using the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. The primary end points were the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70 responses and the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) at 24 and 48 weeks. The secondary end points were patient-reported outcomes (PROs; Health Assessment Questionnaire, Short Form 36, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scores) and adverse events. Noninferiority of low-dose RTX was tested using different approaches, one of which was based on the fixed margin method.Results. In total, 6 RCTs and 2 cohort studies were identified. Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis of efficacy outcomes, which showed no significant differences in the primary outcomes between low- and high-dose RTX. Non-inferiority criteria of low-dose RTX were met for the ACR20, ACR50, DAS28, and PROs (at 24 and 48 weeks). Serious adverse events did not differ significantly. The results of 2 additional RCTs and a meta-analysis of 2 cohort studies corroborated the results of the meta-analysis of RCTs.Conclusion. Low-dose RTX has similar effectiveness and met noninferiority criteria for most primary outcomes. Considering the lower cost, it should be the standard RTX regimen for RA.
机译:目的。类风湿关节炎(RA)的利妥昔单抗(RTX)批准剂量为2 x 1,000 mg输注,间隔2周。有证据表明,小剂量RTX(2 x 500 mg)的有效性。我们的目的是比较低剂量和高剂量RTX的疗效和安全性,并测试低剂量方案的非劣效性。方法。使用Embase,PubMed,Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science数据库进行了系统的文献综述,以寻找随机对照试验(RCT)和比较低剂量和高剂量RTX用于RA的队列研究。主要终点为美国风湿病学院在24周和48周时改善20%(ACR20),ACR50和ACR70的反应以及28个关节的疾病活动评分(DAS28)。次要终点是患者报告的结局(PRO;健康评估问卷,简表36,以及慢性病治疗-疲劳评分的功能评估)和不良事件。使用不同的方法测试了低剂量RTX的非劣效性,其中一种是基于固定余量法。结果。总共确定了6项RCT和2项队列研究。疗效结果的荟萃分析包括四个RCT,在低剂量和大剂量RTX之间的主要结果中均无显着差异。 ACR20,ACR50,DAS28和PRO符合低剂量RTX的非劣效性标准(在第24和48周时)。严重不良事件无明显差异。另外2个RCT的结果和2个队列研究的荟萃分析证实了RCT的荟萃分析的结果。小剂量RTX具有相似的疗效,并且对于大多数主要结局达到了非劣效性标准。考虑到较低的成本,它应该是RA的标准RTX方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号