首页> 外文期刊>Asia Europe Journal >Inter-regionalism in international relations: Comparing APEC and ASEM
【24h】

Inter-regionalism in international relations: Comparing APEC and ASEM

机译:国际关系中的区域间主义:比较亚太经合组织和亚欧会议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Depending on one's theoretical perspective, inter-regionalism is assumed by IR scholars to have arisen in response to the need to check the exalted power of the United States (and, in the economic realm, also the European Union and East Asia) and/or the growing complexity of world politics (the rise of "interdependence" or "globalisation"). More recently, inter-regionalism has also been interpreted as a way to enhance regional collective identities. This paper looks at the evolution and recent performance of APEC and ASEM in the light of these theoretical assumptions about the origins and the functions of APEC and ASEM. Its principal findings are puzzling: while there are indications that APEC and ASEM were indeed meant by governments to fulfil some of the functions identified by those theoretical perspectives, the evidence that APEC or ASEM effectively served any of them is thin. Their actual functions and their durability against the background of a seemingly poor political track record therefore need to be rethought.
机译:根据一个人的理论观点,IR学者认为区域间主义的出现是出于对检查美国(以及在经济领域,还包括欧洲联盟和东亚)的崇高实力和/或世界政治日益复杂(“相互依存”或“全球化”的兴起)。最近,区域间主义也被解释为增强区域集体认同的一种方式。本文根据有关APEC和ASEM的起源和功能的理论假设,探讨了APEC和ASEM的演变和近期性能。它的主要发现令人困惑:尽管有迹象表明,APEC和ASEM确实是政府履行这些理论观点所确定的某些职能的手段,但APEC或ASEM有效地为其中任何一个服务的证据很少。因此,在政治看似糟糕的背景下,它们的实际功能和持久性需要重新考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号