首页> 外文期刊>Arzneimittel-Forschung: =Drug Research >Comparative bioavailability of two cefdinir suspension formulations in Middle Eastern healthy volunteers after single oral administration.
【24h】

Comparative bioavailability of two cefdinir suspension formulations in Middle Eastern healthy volunteers after single oral administration.

机译:一次口服后,两种头孢地尼悬浮制剂在中东健康志愿者中的比较生物利用度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this study was to compare the bioavailability, after oral administration, of the generic "Adcef Suspension" (test) (125 mg/5 ml cefdinir; CAS 91832-40-5), with that of a commercially available original preparation (reference) (125 mg/ 5 ml cefdinir). For this purpose a randomized, two-way, crossover, bioequivalence study was performed in 24 healthy, male volunteers. The Middle Eastern selected volunteers were divided into two groups of 12 subjects. One group was treated with the reference standard and the other one with the test, with a crossover after the drug washout period of 7 days. Blood samples were collected at fixed time intervals and cefdinir concentrations were determined by a validated HPLC assay method. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-24), AUC(0-infinity), C(max), T(max), K(e) and T1/2 were determined for both formulations and were compared statistically to evaluate the bioequivalence betwee the two brands of cefdinir, using the statistical model recommended by the FDA. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) did not show any significant difference between the two formulations and 90% confidence intervals (CI) fell within the acceptable range for bioequivalence. Based on the statistical evaluation it was concluded that the two formulations exhibit.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较口服“ Adcef悬浮液”(测试)(125 mg / 5 ml头孢地尼; CAS 91832-40-5)与市售原始制剂(测试后)的生物利用度。参考)(125毫克/ 5毫升头孢地尼)。为此,在24位健康的男性志愿者中进行了一项随机,双向,交叉,生物等效性研究。中东选定的志愿者分为两组,每组12名。一组接受参考标准治疗,另一组接受测试,药物洗脱期为7天后进行交叉。以固定的时间间隔收集血样,并通过经过验证的HPLC分析方法确定头孢地尼的浓度。确定了两种配方的药代动力学参数AUC(0-24),AUC(0-无穷大),C(max),T(max),K(e)和T1 / 2,并进行统计学比较以评估两者之间的生物等效性。头孢地尼的两个品牌,使用的是FDA推荐的统计模型。方差分析(ANOVA)没有显示两种配方之间的任何显着差异,并且90%置信区间(CI)落在生物等效性的可接受范围内。根据统计评估得出结论,这两种配方均表现出来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号