首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >Biomechanical evaluation of a bioabsorbable expansion bolt for hamstring graft fixation in ACL reconstruction: an experimental study in calf tibial bone.
【24h】

Biomechanical evaluation of a bioabsorbable expansion bolt for hamstring graft fixation in ACL reconstruction: an experimental study in calf tibial bone.

机译:ACL重建中用于绳肌腱植入物固定的可生物吸收膨胀螺栓的生物力学评估:小腿胫骨的实验研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of our study was to evaluate and compare the primary fixation strength of a novel bioabsorbable two shell expansion bolt (EB) with that of a well-established interference screw-fixation technique in hamstring reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty calf tibia plateaus (age 5-6 months) were assigned to three groups: In group I (n = 10) triple-stranded hamstring grafts were fixed with titanium interference screws (7 mm thread / 8 mm head x 25 mm). Specimens of group II (n = 10) received bioabsorbable poly-L-lactide interference screws (8 x 23 mm). In group III (n = 10), the grafts were fixed using bioabsorbable poly-D,L-lactide expansion bolts (5.8/8.5/10 mm x 35 mm). The tensile axis was placed parallel to the bone tunnel. The construction was then loaded until failure under a displacement rate of 1 mm per second. RESULTS: There were no significant differences concerning the maximum pullout force (group I: 357 N +/- 61; group II: 326 N +/- 92; group III: 343 N +/- 55). In case of the expansion bolt, we found the stiffness to be higher (61 N/mm) when compared to group I (48 N/mm), and group II (52N/mm) (P < 0.01 I vs. III). Using interference screws, we were able to demonstrate a strong correlation between torque and pullout forces (group I: r2 = 0.7; group II: r2 = 0.92). Ruptures of the suturing material occurred only in groups I and II. CONCLUSION: We conclude that hamstring graft fixation, using the presented expansion bolt, demonstrates fixation strength similar to the established screw fixation and can therefore be regarded as a reasonable alternative fixation method. Especially, since some specific disadvantages of screw fixation can be prevented by application of the bolt fixation.
机译:引言:我们的研究目的是评估和比较新型生物可吸收的两壳膨胀螺栓(EB)与成熟的过盈螺钉固定技术在前十字韧带li绳肌重建中的主要固定强度。材料和方法:将30头小腿胫骨平台(5-6个月龄)分为三组:在第一组(n = 10)中,用钛金属干涉螺钉(7毫米螺纹/ 8毫米头x 25根)固定三链str绳肌移植物。毫米)。 II组(n = 10)的标本装有可生物吸收的聚L-丙交酯干扰螺钉(8 x 23 mm)。在第III组(n = 10)中,使用可生物吸收的聚D,L-丙交酯膨胀螺栓(5.8 / 8.5 / 10 mm x 35 mm)固定移植物。拉伸轴平行于骨隧道放置。然后,以每秒1 mm的位移速率加载结构直至失效。结果:最大拔出力没有显着差异(I组:357 N +/- 61; II组:326 N +/- 92; III组:343 N +/- 55)。对于膨胀螺栓,我们发现与I组(48 N / mm)和II组(52N / mm)相比,刚度更高(61 N / mm)(P <0.01 I vs. III)。使用干涉螺钉,我们能够证明扭矩和拉拔力之间有很强的相关性(I组:r2 = 0.7; II组:r2 = 0.92)。缝合材料的破裂仅发生在第一组和第二组中。结论:我们得出的结论是,使用提出的膨胀螺栓进行的绳肌移植物固定具有与既定的螺钉固定相似的固定强度,因此可以被视为一种合理的替代固定方法。特别地,由于可以通过应用螺栓固定来防止螺钉固定的一些特定缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号