...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >MR arthrography of traumatic anterior shoulder lesions showed modest reproducibility and accuracy when evaluated under clinical circumstances.
【24h】

MR arthrography of traumatic anterior shoulder lesions showed modest reproducibility and accuracy when evaluated under clinical circumstances.

机译:在临床情况下评估时,创伤性前肩部病变的MR关节造影显示适度的可重复性和准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: We examined the reproducibility and accuracy of high-field MRA in traumatic anterior shoulder instability under conditions resembling clinical practice and assessed the influence of observer experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two radiologists with different experience levels evaluated 61 MRAs. Assessment was independent, blinded and non-sequential. For 40 MRAs, surgical reports were available to assess diagnosis accuracy and influence of observer experience. The assessed lesions were cuff lesions, Hill-Sachs lesions, bony and classic Bankart lesions, greater humeral tuberosity fractures, SLAP lesions and joint capsule lesions. Reproducibility was quantified using kappa coefficients. Accuracy was evaluated with sensitivity and specificity rates, positive and negative predictive values. Differences in the percentage of correctly diagnosed MRAs between the radiologists were tested using McNemar's test for paired proportions. RESULTS: Inter-observer k-values ranged from 0.03 for joint capsulelesions to 0.45 for humeral head lesions. The overall kappa was 0.21 (95% CI; 0.12-0.30). We also observed markedly lower sensitivity and specificity rates than those reported in the literature for most lesions. The more experienced radiologist correctly diagnosed 78.9% of all lesions compared to 65.4% for the less experienced radiologist (P < 0.001; McNemar's test). CONCLUSION: MRA-interpretations of traumatic anterior shoulder instability should be regarded with caution in clinical practice. The experience level of radiologists can affect reproducibility and accuracy.
机译:简介:我们研究了在类似于临床实践的条件下,高场MRA在外伤性前肩不稳定性中的重现性和准确性,并评估了观察者经验的影响。材料与方法:两位经验不同的放射科医生对61份MRA进行了评估。评估是独立的,盲目的和非顺序的。对于40个MRA,可获得外科手术报告以评估诊断的准确性和观察者经验的影响。评估的病变包括袖口病变,Hill-Sachs病变,骨和经典Bankart病变,较大的肱骨结节骨折,SLAP病变和关节囊病变。可重复性使用κ系数定量。通过敏感性和特异性率,阳性和阴性预测值评估准确性。使用McNemar检验对成对的比例,检验放射科医生之间正确诊断的MRA百分比的差异。结果:观察者间k值范围从关节囊病变的0.03到肱骨头病变的0.45。总kappa为0.21(95%CI; 0.12-0.30)。我们还观察到大多数病变的敏感性和特异性率明显低于文献报道的敏感性和特异性率。经验丰富的放射科医生正确诊断出所有病变的78.9%,而经验不足的放射科医生正确诊断为65.4%(P <0.001; McNemar检验)。结论:在临床实践中应谨慎考虑MRA对外伤性前肩不稳的解释。放射科医生的经验水平会影响可重复性和准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号