首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >The direct lateral approach: impact on gait patterns, foot progression angle and pain in comparison with a minimally invasive anterolateral approach.
【24h】

The direct lateral approach: impact on gait patterns, foot progression angle and pain in comparison with a minimally invasive anterolateral approach.

机译:直接外侧入路:与微创前外侧入路相比,对步态,脚步角度和疼痛的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty has been successfully introduced in the past decade. Nevertheless, standard approaches such as the direct lateral approach are still commonly used in orthopaedic surgery due to easy handling, good intra-operative overview and low complication rates. However, a frequent occurrence of fatty atrophy within the anterior third of the gluteus medius muscle has been demonstrated when using the modified direct-lateral approach (mDL), which may be associated with a reduction in function, limitation of internal leg rotation, gait disorders and pain. The question addressed in this study is whether mDL-approach leads to unfavourable changes in foot progression angle (FPA), gait and to more postoperative pain compared with a minimally invasive anterolateral approach (ALMI).Thirty patients with primary osteoarthritis of the hip were recruited for this study. All subjects received an uncemented THA (Alloclassic-Zweymüller stem, Allofit Cup, FA Zimmer), 15 through an ALMI-approach and 15 via the mDL-approach. Gait analyses were performed both preoperatively and 3 months after surgery to measure FPA, step length, stance duration, cadence and walking speed. Additionally, the Harris-Hip Score, pain according to the visual analogue scale and the Trendelenburg sign were evaluated.No influence of the surgical approach could be observed on the gait patterns or FPA. Furthermore, neither increased external rotation of the limb nor restriction of internal rotation during walking could be established. Pain and Harris-Hip Score did not diVer significantly between the two groups.In comparison with an ALMI approach, the mDL approach did not lead to a change in FPA postoperatively. No detrimental effect could be found on the gait pattern or pain after surgery. Based on these measurements, the minimally invasive anterolateral approach did not appear to provide functional benefits in outcome over the mDL approach. Consequently, both surgical approaches seem to be equally applicable approaches with good to very good functional results.
机译:在过去的十年中,微创全髋关节置换术已经成功引入。然而,由于易于操作,良好的术中总体观察和较低的并发症发生率,标准方法如直接外侧入路仍然在整形外科手术中普遍使用。然而,当使用改良的直接外侧入路(mDL)时,已经证明了臀中肌前三分之一处脂肪萎缩的频繁发生,这可能与功能降低,腿内部旋转受限,步态障碍有关和痛苦。本研究解决的问题是,与微创前外侧入路(ALMI)相比,mDL方法是否会导致脚进展角度(FPA),步态的不利变化以及术后疼痛的增加。本研究招募了30例原发性髋骨关节炎患者这项研究。所有受试者均通过ALMI方法获得15根未粘固的THA(Alloclassic-Zweymüller茎,Allofit杯,FA Zimmer),通过ALMI方法获得15株,通过mDL方法获得15株。在术前和术后3个月进行步态分析,以测量FPA,步长,姿势持续时间,节奏和步行速度。此外,还评估了Harris-Hip评分,根据视觉模拟量表的疼痛程度和特伦德伦伯伦氏症的症状,未观察到手术方法对步态或FPA的影响。此外,既不能建立四肢外旋的增加,也不能建立行走过程中内旋的限制。两组之间的疼痛和Harris-Hip评分无明显差异。与ALMI方法相比,mDL方法未导致术后FPA发生变化。在手术后的步态模式或疼痛上没有发现有害的影响。基于这些测量结果,微创前外侧入路似乎没有提供比mDL入路更大的功能益处。因此,这两种外科手术方法似乎都是同等适用的方法,具有良好的效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号