首页> 外文期刊>Brain stimulation >Double-blind randomized controlled study showing symptomatic and cognitive superiority of bifrontal over bitemporal electrode placement during electroconvulsive therapy for schizophrenia
【24h】

Double-blind randomized controlled study showing symptomatic and cognitive superiority of bifrontal over bitemporal electrode placement during electroconvulsive therapy for schizophrenia

机译:双盲随机对照研究显示,在精神分裂症电痉挛治疗中,双额叶的症状和认知优势优于双时相电极放置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Several studies show that bifrontal electrode placement produces relatively fewer cognitive adverse effects than bitemporal placement during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in depression. There are no reports comparing these electrode placements in schizophrenia. Objectives: This study compared the clinical and cognitive effects of bifrontal and bitemporal electrode placements in schizophrenia patients referred for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Methods: 122 schizophrenia patients who were prescribed ECT were randomized to receive ECT with either bifrontal (BFECT; n = 62) or bitemporal (BTECT; n = 60) placement. Their concomitant anti-psychotic medications and the number of ECT sessions were not controlled. Psychopathology was assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), and the Nurse Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (NOSIE). Cognitive functions were assessed 24-h after the final ECT using a battery of tests. Clinical improvement was compared using chi-square test, repeated measures ANOVA and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Cognitive adverse effects were compared using t-test. Results: At the end of 2 weeks (after 6 ECT sessions) 63% and 13.2% of BFECT and BTECT patients respectively had met the response criterion for BPRS (40% reduction in total score; OR = 20.8; 95% CI = 3.61-34.33). BFECT patients showed significantly faster clinical response on BPRS (Time × Group interaction effect: P = 0.001), BFCRS (P < 0.001) and the NOSIE total assets score (P = 0.003). ANCOVA using baseline scores as covariates and treatment-resistance status as between-subject factor showed that BFECT patients had significantly greater improvement in all measures. BFECT patients had significantly higher PGI-memory-scale total score than BTECT patients (t = 5.16; P < 0.001). They also showed superior performance in other cognitive measures. Conclusions: BFECT results in superior clinical and cognitive outcomes than BTECT in schizophrenia patients referred for ECT.
机译:背景:多项研究表明,在抑郁症的电抽搐治疗(ECT)期间,双额电极放置产生的认知不良反应比双时相放置产生的副作用要少。没有报道比较这些电极在精神分裂症中的位置。目的:本研究比较了双前额电极和双时相电极放置在电痉挛治疗(ECT)精神分裂症患者中的临床和认知效果。方法:122名接受ECT治疗的精神分裂症患者被随机分配接受双额(BFECT; n = 62)或双颞(BTECT; n = 60)放置的ECT。他们的伴随抗精神病药物和ECT疗程的次数不受控制。使用简短精神病学评定量表(BPRS),布什-弗朗西斯·卡塔尼亚(Bush-Francis Catatonia)评定量表(BFCRS)和住院病人评估护士观察量表(NOSIE)评估精神病理学。最终ECT后24小时使用一系列测试评估认知功能。使用卡方检验,重复测量方差分析和协方差分析(ANCOVA)比较临床改善。使用t检验比较认知不良反应。结果:在2周结束时(6次ECT疗程后),分别有63%和13.2%的BFECT和BTECT患者达到了BPRS的缓解标准(总评分降低40%; OR = 20.8; 95%CI = 3.61- 34.33)。 BFECT患者对BPRS的临床反应显着加快(时间×组交互作用:P = 0.001),BFCRS(P <0.001)和NOSIE总资产评分(P = 0.003)。 ANCOVA使用基线评分作为协变量,而治疗耐药性状态作为受试者之间的因素表明,BFECT患者在所有指标上都有明显改善。 BFECT患者的PGI记忆量表总分明显高于BTECT患者(t = 5.16; P <0.001)。他们还显示出在其他认知指标上的优异表现。结论:在接受ECT治疗的精神分裂症患者中,BFECT比BTECT具有更好的临床和认知效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号